IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER M.A. no.413/Mum./2023 (Arising out of ITA No.2141/Mum./2022) (Assessment Year : 2013–14) Shri Rajesh M. Trivedi B–205, Meri Gold Ram Mandir Road Vazira Naka Borivali (West) Mumbai 400 092 PAN – ABXPT5347F ................ Applicant (Original Appellant) v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle–2, Thane ................ Respondent (Original Respondent ) Assessee by : Shri Karan Jain Revenue by : Ms. Mahita Nair Date of Hearing – 25/08/2023 Date of Order – 30/08/2023 O R D E R PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M. The present Miscellaneous Application (“M.A”) has been filed by the assessee seeking recall of the ex–parte order dated 31/01/2023, passed under section 254(1) of the Act, by the Co–ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in assessee’s appeal being ITA no.2141/Mum./2022, for the assessment year 2013–14. 2. During the hearing, the learned Authorised Representative (“learned A.R.”) submitted that he was authorised to represent the assessee in the appeal, however he could not attend the hearing fixed on 30/01/2023, as he Shri Rajesh M. Trivedi M.A. no.413/Mum./2023 Page | 2 was unwell due to Covid-19 viral infection. Accordingly, the learned A.R. prayed for recall of the ex–parte order passed by the Co–ordinate Bench of the Tribunal. 3. On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative (“learned D.R”) opposed the prayer made by the learned A.R. for recall of the order. 4. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. The Co–ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the absence of representation on behalf of the assessee proceeded to decide the appeal ex– parte qua the assessee after hearing the submissions of the Revenue and perusal of the material available on record. By way of the present M.A., the assessee has sought recall of the aforesaid ex-parte order dated 31/01/2023. It is the plea of the assessee that the learned A.R. who was authorised to represent on his behalf was unwell on the date of the hearing due to Covid-19 viral infection and therefore, could not attend the hearing of the appeal. During the hearing, the learned A.R. also submitted that due to the aforesaid reason, he could not instruct anyone in his office to seek adjournment as he was under home isolation. 5. In view of the above, we are of the considered view that there was sufficient cause for non-appearance on behalf of the assessee when the appeal was called on for hearing on 30/01/2023. Therefore, we deem it fit and appropriate to recall the aforesaid ex–parte order dated 31/01/2023, passed in ITA no.2141/Mum./2022, for a fresh hearing of the appeal on merits. The Registry is directed to fix the appeal for hearing on 09/10/2023 i.e., the date Shri Rajesh M. Trivedi M.A. no.413/Mum./2023 Page | 3 which is convenient to both the parties. Since the date of hearing was pronounced in the open Court during the course of the hearing, issuance of notice to the parties is hereby dispensed with. 6. In the result, the present M.A. by the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 30/08/2023 Sd/- OM PRAKASH KANT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Sd/- SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED: 30/08/2023 Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial); (4) The DR, ITAT, Mumbai; and (5) Guard file. True Copy By Order Pradeep J. Chowdhury Sr. Private Secretary Assistant Registrar ITAT, Mumbai