IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCHES “B” : PUNE BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G.D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M.A.No.413/PUN/2022 Arising out of ITA.No.1138/PUN./2018 - Assessment Year – 2008-2009 Mr. Sable Yashwant Laxman, Sable Apartments, Shantinagar, Next to Hotel Maharaja, Old Mumbai- Pune Highway, Khopoli. PIN 410 203 PAN PNES09546F vs. The DCIT, Panvel Circle, Panvel. Dist. Raigad. (Applicant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Viraj Mehta, And Shri Nilesh Patel For Revenue : Shri Ramnath P Murkunde Date of Hearing : 19.05.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 25.05.2023 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J.M. This assessee’s miscellaneous application M.A.No.413/PUN./2022 filed u/s. 254(2) of the of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act"), seeks to recall/rectify the tribunal’s ex-parte order dated 18.10.2022 dismissing his main appeal ITA.No.1138/PUN./2012. Heard both the parties. Case files perused. 2. A perusal of paras 3 and 4 in our impugned order suggests that we had inter alia held regarding the former issue of sec.40A(3) disallowance of Rs.21,17,033/- that the same 2 MA.No.413/PUN./2022 nowhere emerge out of the Assessing Officer’s assessment dated 25.03.2015 and therefore, rightly rejected in the CIT(A)'s order whereas the latter authority had also restored the second issue of short credit of TDS to the tune of Rs.13,59,458/- back to Assessing Officer, respectively. That being the case, we had dismissed the assessee’s main appeal ITA.No.1138/PUN./ 2012 for these two precise reasons. 3. Learned counsel submits during the course of hearing that the assessee in fact had wrongly computed his sec.40A(3) disallowance in his computation filed before the Assessing Officer and therefore, we ought to re-call/rectify our order dated 18.10.2022. He fails to dispute the clinching fact that such a computation of assessee in absence of Assessing Officer having made its disallowance, does not give rise to any first and second appeal leading to an apparent error on record in light of ACIT vs. Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Ltd., [2008] 305 ITR 227 (SC) & CIT vs. Reliance Telecom Ltd., [2021] 133 taxmann.com 41 (SC). Learned counsel has not raised any argument regarding above second issue of short credit of TDS. We thus reject assessee’s instant miscellaneous application MA.No.413/PUN./2022 in very terms. ordered accordingly. 3 MA.No.413/PUN./2022 4. This assessee’s miscellaneous application is dismissed in above terms. Order pronounced in the open Court on 25 th May, 2023. Sd/- Sd/- (GD PADMAHSHALI) (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Pune, Dated 25 th May, 2023 VBP/- Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The appellant 2. The respondent 3. Ld. CIT(A)-2, Pune 4. Ld. Pr. CIT-2, Thane 5. DR ITAT Pune-B Bench, Pune 6. Guard File. //BY Order// Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Pune Benches, Pune.