IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES A , MUMBAI BEFORE SHIRI R. S. SYAL, AM AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM M.A. NO. : 491/MUM/2011 (ARISING OUT OF I.T.A. NO. 892/MUM/2004) ASSESSMENT YEAR : 1996-97 M/S. RUKMANI ESTATE PVT. LTD. FELTHAM HOUSE, 10, J.N. HEREDIA MARG, BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI-400 038 PAN NO: AAACR 2566 F VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(1), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MUMBAI-400 020. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) A SSESSEE BY : MS. SHABHA CHHABARIA DEPARTMENT BY : SHRI OM PRAKASH DATE OF HEARING : 1 2.10 .2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 07.11.2012 ORDER PER AMIT SHUKLA, JM : THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED BY TH E ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28.06.2007 OF THE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO.892/MUM/2004. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING THE LD. COUNSEL HAS FILED A PETITION FOR WITHDRAWING THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION TO WHICH THE LD. DR HAS NO OBJECTION. IN THIS VIEW OF THE MATTER WE ALLOW THE WITHDRAWAL OF M.A. NO. 491/MUM/2011 M/S. RUKMANI ESTATE PVT. LTD. 2 MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION AND AS A RESULT THE SAME IS TREATED AS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 07.11.2012. SD/- SD/- ( R. S. SYAL ) ( AMIT SHUKLA ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI, DT: 07.11.2012 COPY FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT, 2. THE RESPONDENT, 3. THE C.I.T. 4. CIT (A) 5. THE DR, J- BENCH, ITAT, MUMBAI //TRUE COPY// BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI ROSHANI