Sh. Parveen Kumar Malhotra, New Delhi V. ACIT, New Delhi

MA 51/DEL/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 123 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6895 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 7 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 16-09-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 31-01-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: Y KAKKAR

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F NEW DELHI (FRIDAY) BEFORE SHRI R.P. TOLANI AND SHRI K.G. BANSAL M.A. NO. 51/DEL/2011 ( IN ITA NO.3507/DEL/10 ) ASSTT. YR: 2007-08 PARVEN KUMAR MALHOTRA, VS. ACIT CIR. 32(1), A-134, ARJUN NAGAR KOTLA NEW DELHI. MUBARAKPUR, NEW DELHI. PAN/GIR NO. AAFPM6431Q ( APPLICANT ) ( RESPONDENT ) APPLICANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY: MS. Y. KAKKAR SR. DR O R D E R PER R.P. TOLANI, J.M : THIS IS ASSESSEES MISC. APPLICATION U/S 254(2) OF THE I.T. ACT, 1961, PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF ITAT ORDER DATED 21-9-2010 PASSED IN THE ABOVE CAPTIONED APPEAL. 2. NONE PUT IN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE HEARING OF M.A. FIXED FOR 16-9-2011 DESPITE ISSUE OF NOTICE FO R HEARING BY REGISTERED A.D. POST. EVEN NO REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARI NG HAS BEEN RECEIVED. IT GIVES AN IMPRESSION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTER ESTED IN PURSUING THE M.A. 2 WE, THEREFORE, HAVE NO OPTION BUT TO DISMISS THE M. A. PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE, PLACING RELIANCE ON THE RATIO OF DECISION S IN THE FOLLOWING CASES: CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL .); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR 223 ITR 480 (MP). 5. IN THE RESULT, ASSESSEES M.A. IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 16-09-2011. SD/- SD/- ( K.G. BANSAL ) ( R.P. TOLANI ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 16-09-2011. MP COPY TO : 1. ASSESSEE 2. AO 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR 3