Aruna Pegatraju, Nellore V. ACIT, Central Circle, Tirupati

MA 51/Hyd/2023

AI Insights

This case involves Smt. Aruna Pegatraju, the appellant, contesting decisions made by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Tirupati, the respondent, concerning the assessment years 2014-15, 2016-17, and 2017-18. The core of the dispute was not detailed in the provided document, but it typically revolves around issues such as tax assessments, disputes over tax liabilities, or procedural disagreements in the assessment process. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Hyderabad, after reviewing the submissions and evidence presented, decided to correct a typographical error in their previous order regarding the costs to be paid by the appellant, which were set at Rs. 10,000 for each assessment year, totaling Rs. 30,000.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 122308 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 24-09-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB-B
• Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2023
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Appeal Filed On: 29-05-2023
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD ‘B’ BENCH, HYDERABAD. BEFORE SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER M.A. Nos.49 to 51/Hyd/2023 in ITA Nos.377, 378 & 379/Hyd/2022 Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2016-17 and 2017-18 Smt. Aruna Pegatraju, R/o.Nellore. PAN : AEIPP6276R. Vs. Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Tirupati. (Applicant / Appellant) (Respondent / Respondent) Assessee by: Sri Sashank Dundu, Advocate. Revenue by: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, Sr. A.R. CORRIGENDUM We find that there is a typographical error at the end of Paragraph 7 on page 4 of the order dt.11.09.2023 with regard to the payment of costs. Therefore, suo motu, the following correction is made at the last lines of Paragraph 7, and it should be read as follows : “........ However, this would be subject to payment of the cost of Rs.10,000/- each, totaling to Rupees Thirty Thousand only. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes.” Sd/- Sd/- S(RAMA KANTA PANDA) (LALIET KUMAR) Accountant Member Judicial Member Hyderabad, Dt. 25.09.2023. *TYNM, SPS 2 Copy to: S.No Addresses 1 Smt. Aruna Pegatraju, Door No.16/1681 Mini Bye Pass, Ramamurthy Nagar, Nellore – 524002, A.P. 2 ACIT, Central Circle, Tirupati 3 PCIT – Central, Visakhapatnam 4 DR, ITAT Hyderabad Benches 5 Guard File By Order 3