IN THE INC OME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE HONBLE SH. R. C. SHARMA , AM AND HONBLE SH . SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM M .A. NO . 621 /MUM/2018 (IN ITA NO.2225/MUM/2017 ) ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2008 - 09 ) M/S ROTHSHIELD HEALTH CARE (TP A) SERVICES LTD. RAHEJA CHAMBERS, FREE PRESS JOURNAL MARG, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI - 400021 / VS. ITO - 1(3)(1), ROOM NO. 541, 5 TH FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, M. K. ROAD, MUMBAI - 400 020 ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. AADCR3362C ( / APPELL ANT ) : ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI DINESH R. SHAH , AR / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI MANOJ KUMAR SINGH , DR / DATE OF HEARING : 07.12 .201 8 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 28.12.2018 / O R D E R PER SANDEEP GOSAIN, J UDICIAL MEMBER : THE PRESENT MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION H AS BE EN MOVED BY ASSESSEE FOR RESTORING THE EX P ARTE APPEAL BEARING ITA NO. 2225/MUM/2017 FOR AY 2008 - 09 AND PROVIDING OPPORTUNITY OF HEARING TO THE ASSESSEE. 2 M A NO. 621 /MUM/2018 M/S ROTHSHIELD HEALTH CARE (TPA) SERVICES LTD. 2. THE LD AR APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DRAWN OUR ATTENTION TOWARDS LETTER DATED 4 TH OCT 2018 THEREBY STATING THAT DUE TO UNFORESEEN C IRCUMSTANCES, THE ASSESSEE OR HIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE COULD NOT APPEARED BEFORE THE HONBLE ITAT AND THE ASSE SSEE WOULD DEFINITELY LIKE TO PURSUE THE MATTER AND WOULD LIKE TO CONTEST THE SAID APPEAL. 3. AFTER HEARING THE COUNSEL S FOR BOTH THE PARTIES AND PERUSAL OF THE MATERIAL PLACED ON RECORD . WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT IT WAS THE BOUNDED DUTY OF THE ASSESSEE OR HIS COUNSEL TO APPEAR BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IN COMPLIANCE OF THE NOTICE RECEIVED BY HIM. THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT ACTED WITH DUE DILIGENCE. NEVERTHELESS T HE P RINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE DEMANDS THAT THE LIS BETWEEN THE PARTIES SHOULD BE DECIDED ON MERITS AFTER PROVIDING DUE OPPORTUNITY OF HEARING TO BOTH THE PARTIES . ALTHOUGH IN THE PRESENT CASE ADEQUATE OPPORTUNITY OF HEARING T O BOTH THE PARTIES WAS GIVEN BUT STILL THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT APPEARED AND HAS NOW RAISED A PLEA THAT BECAUSE OF THE REASONS STATED IN TH E APPLICATION THE ASSESSEE OR HIS ADVOCATE COULD NOT APPEAR AND THERE WAS NO MALAFID E INTENTION OR DELIBERATE DEFAULT ON THE PART OF THE ASSESSEE OR HIS ADVOCATE . 4 . BE THAT AS IT MAY, C ONSIDERING THE FACT S AND CIRCU MSTANCES OF THE PRESENT CASE , WE ARE OF THE CONSIDERED VIEW THAT THE ENDS OF JUSTICE WOULD BE MET ONLY WHEN WE PROVIDE ONE MORE OPPORTUNITY OF HEARING TO THE ASSESSEE FOR CONTESTING 3 M A NO. 621 /MUM/2018 M/S ROTHSHIELD HEALTH CARE (TPA) SERVICES LTD. THE APPEAL ON MERITS . IN OUR VIEW, IF THIS M.A. IS ALLOWED, NO PREJUDICE WOULD BE CAUSED TO THE INTEREST OF REVEN UE AS LEGITIMATE TAXES DUE ON THE ASSESSEES CORRECT INCOME WILL BE COLLECTED . WHEREAS, IF THE CONTRARY VIEW IS TAKEN THEN IN THAT EVENTUALITY THE ASSESSEE MAY BE PUT TO GREAT HARDSHIP AND DIFFICULTY. T HEREFORE , KEEPING IN VIEW THE ABOVE DISCUSSION, WE REC ALL THE EX - PARTE ORDER IN ITA NO. 2225/MUM/2017 DATED 06.08.18 AND RESTORE THE A PPEAL FOR HEARING ON MERITS BY THE REGULAR BENCH. REGISTRY IS DIRECTED TO FIX THE PRESENT APPEAL BEFORE REGULAR BENCH AND ISSUE NOTICES TO BOTH THE PARTIES FOR HEARING. 5 . IN THE NET RESULT, THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE STANDS ALLOWED IN TERMS INDICATED ABOVE . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 28 TH DEC , 2018. SD/ - SD/ - ( R.C. SHARMA ) (SANDEE P GOSAIN) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI ; DATED : 28 .12 .18 SR.PS DHANANJAY 4 M A NO. 621 /MUM/2018 M/S ROTHSHIELD HEALTH CARE (TPA) SERVICES LTD. / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT 3. ( ) / THE CIT(A) 4. / CIT - CONCERNED 5. , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. / GUARD F I LE / BY ORD ER, / (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI