IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH A', HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER M.A. NO. 69/HYD/2012 IN S.A. NO. 163/HYD/2011 ARISING OUT OF I.T.A. NO. 891/HYD/2011 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09 M/S. MALI FLOREX LTD. REP. BY SRI S. NARAYANA REDDY, HYDERABAD-500 032 PAN: AACCM8205A V S. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, HYDERABAD APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY: SRI M.H. NAIK DATE OF HEARING: 07.09 .201 2 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 07.09.2012 O R D E R PER CHANDRA POOJARI, AM: BY THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION THE ASSESSEE SEE KS MODIFICATION IN TRIBUNAL ORDER IN SA NO. 163/HYD/20 11 DATED 21.3.2012. 2. NONE APPEARED FOR THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY PETITION SEE KING ADJOURNMENT OF THE HEARING WAS SUBMITTED TO THIS TR IBUNAL. THIS TYPE OF ATTITUDE SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INT ERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION. FOLLOWI NG THE RATIO LAID DOWN BY THE DELHI BENCH OF THIS TRIBUNAL IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. (38 ITD 320), THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICA TION IS NOT ADMITTED AND DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 3. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE IS AT LIBERTY TO FILE A PETIT ION FOR RECALLING THIS ORDER, IF THERE IS SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR NOT APPEARING BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL ON THE SCHEDULED DATE OF HEARIN G I.E., ON 7.9.2012. M.A. NO. 69/HYD/2012 M/S. MALI FLOREX LTD. =================== 2 4. IN THE RESULT, MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION BY THE ASS ESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 7 TH SEPTEMBER, 2012. SD/- (ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER SD/- (CHANDRA POOJARI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER HYDERABAD, DATED THE 7 TH SEPTEMBER, 2012 COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. M/S. MALI FLOREX LTD., REP. BY SRI S. NARAYANA REDD Y, H. NO. 4-51/L/88, PLOT NO. 88, LUMBINI SLN SPRINGS, GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD-500 032. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 6, HYDERABAD. 3. THE CIT(A) - I, HYDERABAD. 4. THE CIT (CENTRAL), HYDERABAD. 5 . THE DR A BENCH, ITAT, HYDERABAD TPRAO