IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'SMC' BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C. SHARMA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MA NO. 697/MUM/2017 (ARISING OUT OF ITA NO. 5632/MUM/2016) (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-11) INCOME TAX OFFICER - 32(2) - 3 C-11, R. NO. 304, 3RD FLOOR PRATYAKSHA KAR BHAVAN BKC, BANDRA (E) MUMBAI 400051 VS. SHRI MANOJ C. PANDURKAR A-1101, GUNDECHA HEIGHTS LBS MARG, KANJURMARG MUMBAI 400078 PAN AAPPP2258N APPLICANT RESPONDENT APPLICANT BY: SHRI V. VIDHYADHAR RESPONDENT BY: NONE DATE OF HEARING: 04.05.2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 07.05.2018 O R D E R PER R.C. SHARMA, AM THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION IS FILED BY THE REVE NUE, IN THE MATTER OF ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL DATED 6 TH FEBRUARY, 2017. 2. THE LEARNED D.R. HIGHLIGHTED THE TYPOGRAPHICAL MIST AKE IN PARA 6 OF THE ORDER. AS PER THE LEARNED D.R. ALL THE PARAS IN THE ORDER REFLECT THAT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. HOWEVER, IN TH E LAST PARA, I.E. PARA 6 IT HAS BEEN WRITTEN AS IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE A SSESSEE IS ALLOWED. 3. WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL AND FOUND THAT THERE IS AN APPARENT TYPOGRAPHICAL MISTAKE IN PARA 6 OF THE ORDER, ACCORDINGLY WE DIRECT THAT PARA 6 SHOULD BE READ AS IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. MA NO. 697/MUM/2017 SHRI MANOJ C. PANDURKAR 2 4. IN THE RESULT, THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FILED BY REVENUE IS ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 7 TH MAY, 2018. SD/ - (R.C. SHARMA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED: 7 TH MAY, 2018 COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT(A) -44, MUMBAI 4. THE CIT - 32, MUMBAI 5. THE DR, SMC BENCH, ITAT, MUMBAI BY ORDER //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI N.P.