IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES A : HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER M.A.NO.7/HYD/2015 ARISING OUT OF ITA.NO.813/HYD/2013 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007 MR. A.SOMALINGAM GOUD, HYDERABAD PAN AENPA1970J VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 9 (3) HYDERABAD. (APPLICANT) (RESPONDENT) FOR APPLICANT : MR. P. RAVI SESHAGIRI RAO FOR RESPONDENT : MR. BANDI RAMAKRISHNA DATE OF HEARING : 13.02.2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 13.02.2015 ORDER PER SAKTIJIT DEY, J.M. BY THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION THE ASSESSEE SEE KS FOR RECTIFICATION OF MISTAKE CREPT IN THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 19.12.2014 PASSED IN ITA.NO.813/HYD/2013. 2. WE HAVE HEARD THE PARTIES AND PERUSED THE MATERIALS ON RECORD. IN THE M.A. IT IS POINTED OUT BY THE ASSESSEE THAT THOUGH THE TRIBUNAL IN PARA-9 OF ITS ORDER DELETED THE ADDITION OF RS. 25 LAKHS BUT IN PARA 10 OF THE ORDER IT IS MENTIONED THAT APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED . AFTER VERIFYING THE RECORDS, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THER E IS A MISTAKE ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD AS INADVERTENTLY THE APPE AL OF THE ASSESSEE IS MENTIONED AS DISMISSED INSTEAD OF AL LOWED IN PARA 10 OF THE ORDER. ACCORDINGLY, WE RECTIFY THE S AME AS UNDER: 2 MA.NO.7/HYD/2015 IN ITA.NO.813/JHYD/2013 MR. A. SOMALINGAM GOUD, HYDERABAD. PARA 10. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED. 3. TO THAT EXTENT, ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 19.12.2014 IS MODIFIED. ORDERED ACCORDINGLY. SD/- SD/- (P.M. JAGTAP) (SAKTIJIT DEY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER HYDERABAD, DATED 13 TH FEBRUARY, 2015 VBP/- COPY TO 1. MR. A. SOMALINGAM GOUD, HYDERABAD. C/O. MR. S. RAMA RAO, ADVOCATE, FLAT NO.102, SHRIYAS ELEGANCE, H.NO .3-6- 643, STREET NO.9, HIMAYATNAGAR, HYDERABAD 500 029 . 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 9(3), HYDERABAD. 3. CIT(A)-VI, HYDERABAD 4. CIT-VI, HYDERABAD. 5. D.R. I.T.A.T. A BENCH, HYDERABAD.