M/s T. W. Fastener, Ludhiana V. ITO, Ludhiana

MA 78/CHANDI/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2012] 123 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9653 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH)
• Duration Of Justice: 8 month(s) 3 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 13-12-2012
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 07-12-2012
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 09-04-2012
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH A CHANDIGARH BEFORE MS.SUSHMA CHOWLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MEHAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MA NO. 78/CHD/2012 IN ITA NO.424/CHD/2011 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007-08 M/S T.W. FASTENER, V IT O, W-1(3), E-280, PHASE-IV, FOCAL POINT LUDHIANA. LUDHIANA. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SHRI ASHWANI KUMAR RESPONDENT BY : SHRI AKHILESH GUPTA DATE OF HEARING : 07.12.2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 13.12.2012 ORDER PER MEHAR SINGH, AM THE PRESENT MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILE D BY THE ASSESSEE, ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL, DATED 22.03.2 012 PASSED IN ITA NO. 424/CHD/2011, A.Y. 2007-08. 2. IN THE ABOVEMENTIONED M.A., IT IS STATED THAT IN THE RESULT OF THE APPEAL, AS CONTAINED IN PARA 10 OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL D ATED 22.3.2012, IT HAS BEEN INADVERTENTLY MENTIONED AS IN THE RESULT, APPEAL IS ALLOWED. WHEREAS, IT SHOULD BE, APPEAL IS DISMISSED . ACCORDINGLY, PARA 10 OF THE ORDER IS AMENDED, BEI NG MISTAKE APPARENT FROM RECORD, WITHIN SECTION 254 OF THE ACT. PARA 10 OF THE ORDER SHOULD BE READ AS UNDER: 10. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL IS DISMISSED, AS INDICA TED ABOVE. 3. IN THE RESULT, MISC. APPLICATION FILED BY THE AS SESSEE IS ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 13 TH DEC.,2012. SD/- SD/- (SUSHMA CHOWLA) (MEHAR SINGH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBE R DATED: 13 TH DEC., 2012. POONAM COPY TO: THE APPELLANT, THE RESPONDENT, THE CIT(A), THE CIT, DR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT CHANDIGARH.