H.L. SUGAR FACTORIES LTD., Pilibhit V. ACIT (TDS), Bareilly

MA 91/LKW/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 124 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3686 (ITAT-LUCKNOW)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 16-10-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 14-08-2015
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: AKSHAY KUMAR GUPTA

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH A, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI. A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M.A. NO. 91/LKW/2015 (IN ITA NO. 552 /LKW/201 4 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2013-14 L.H. SUGAR FACTORIE S LTD. CIVIL LINES, PILIBHIT V. A CIT, (TDS) BAREILLY PAN : AAACL 4597 L (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APP ELL ANT BY: SHRI AKSHAY KUMAR GUPTA, CA RESPONDENT BY: SHRI AMIT NIGAM , D.R. DATE OF HEARING: 09 10 201 5 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 16 10 2015 O R D E R PER SUNIL KUMAR YADAV: THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION IS PREFERRED AGAINS T THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 23.07.2015, DISMISSING THE APPEA L OF THE ASSESSEE. THROUGH THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION, ASSESSEE HA S EXPLAINED HIS ABSENCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING ON ACCOUNT OF WHICH THE APPEAL WAS HEARD AND DISPOSED OF EX-PARTE. THE REASONS FOR HIS ABSENCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING ARE DULY EXPLAINED IN THE MISCELLAN EOUS APPLICATION. 2. BEING CONVINCED WITH EXPLANATION FURNISHED IN TH E MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION, WE RECALL THE ORDER DATED 23.07.2015 A ND DIRECT THE REGISTRY TO REFIX THIS APPEAL FOR HEARING ON 27.10. 2015. :-2-: 3. IN THE RESULT, M.A. OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED. ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE DAT E MENTIONED ON THE CAPTIONED PAGE. SD/ - SD/ - [ A. K. GARODIA ] [ S UNIL KUMAR Y ADAV ] ACCOUNTANT M EMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED 14 TH OCTOBER, 2015 AKS COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR