IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL [ DELHI BENCH D DELHI ] BEFORE SHRI C. L. SETHI, JM & SHRI K. D. RA NJAN, AM MISC. APP. NO. 97 (DEL) OF 2011. ( IN I. T. [SS] APPEAL NO. 333 (DEL) OF 2003 ) . BLOCK ASSESSMENT PERIOD : 1/04/1987 TO 8/05/199 7. M/S. KUBER FLORITECH LTD. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, S32, GREATER KAILASH, PARTI, VS. CENTRAL CIRCLE : 17, N E W D E L H I 110 048. N E W D E L H I. P A N / G I R NO. K 7. ( APPLICANT ) ( RESPO NDENT ) ASSESSEES BY : SHRI R. K. GUPTA, C. A.; DEPARTMENT BY : MS. ANUSHA KHURANA, SR. D. R.; O R D E R. PER K. D. RANJAN, AM : THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 254(2 ) OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 [HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE ACT] IS FILED BY TH E ASSESSEE AGAINST THE CONSOLIDATED ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN CROSS APPEALS IN I. T. [S S] APPEAL NOS. 311 & 333 (DEL) OF 2003 IN RESPECT BLOCK ASSESSMENT PERIOD 1/04/1987 T O 8/05/1997. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE LD. AUTHORIZED REPRE SENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE REQUESTED THE BENCH TO PERMIT THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE MISC. APP LICATION TO WHICH THE LD. SENIOR DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE HAS NO OBJECTION. MISC. APP. NO. 97 (DEL) OF 2011. 2 3. AFTER HEARING BOTH THE PARTIES THE REQUEST OF TH E LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THE MISC. APPLICATION IS ALLOWED. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE MISC. APPLICATION IS DISMISSE D. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON : 19 TH AUGUST, 2011. SD/- SD/- [ C. L. SETHI ] [ K. D. RANJAN ] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED : 19 TH AUGUST, 2011. *MEHTA * COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : - 1. APPLICANT. 2. RESPONDENT. 3. CIT, 4. CIT (APPEALS), 5. DR, ITAT, NEW DELHI. TRUE COPY. BY ORDER. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT.