MADDULA BALAMURALI,CHITTOOR V. ITO, WARD-1, MADANAPAL

ITA 1887/HYD/2025

AI Insights

The case involves an appeal by Maddula Balamurali against an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi. The original order was issued by the Assessing Officer under Section 144 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 04/08/2022, concerning the assessment year 2020-21. At the hearing, the assessee's advocate requested to withdraw the appeal, which was supported by a letter dated 17/03/2023. The Departmental Representative did not object to this request, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn.

• Counselvise Citation: [2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 845456 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-03-2026
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB-A
• Assessment Year: 2020-2021
• Appeal Filed On: 10-11-2025
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 144

Judgement Text

"आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad Įी रवीश सूद, माननीय ÛयाǓयक सदèय एवं Įी मधुसूदन सावͫडया, माननीय लेखा सदèय SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1887/Hyd/2025 (Ǔनधा[रणवष[/ Assessment Year: 2020-21) Maddula Balamurali Chittoor. PAN: APCPB8584M VS. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Madanapalli, Chittoor. (अपीलाथȸ/ Appellant) (Ĥ×यथȸ/ Respondent) करदाताकाĤǓतǓनͬध×व/ Assessee Represented by : Sri P. Vinod, Advocate राजèवकाĤǓतǓनͬध×व/ Department Represented by : Sri AVES Madhukar, Sr. AR सुनवाईसमाÜतहोनेकȧǓतͬथ/ Date of Conclusion of Hearing : 18/03/2026 घोषणा कȧ तारȣख/ Date of Pronouncement : 18/03/2026 ORDER PER RAVISH SOOD, JM: The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, (NFAC), Delhi, dated 13/12/2024, which in turn arises from the order passed by the Printed from counselvise.com 2 ITA No. 1887/Hyd/2025 Maddula Balamurali vs ITO Assessing Officer (for short, “A.O.”) under Section 144 r.w.s 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “the Act”) dated 04/08/2022. Sri P. Vinod, Advocate, Learned Authorised Representative for the assessee, at the threshold of the hearing of the appeal, submitted that as per instructions he seeks to withdraw the present appeal. The Ld.AR has placed on record a letter dated 17/03/2023 seeking withdrawal of the aforesaid appeal, which reads as under : Printed from counselvise.com 3 ITA No. 1887/Hyd/2025 Maddula Balamurali vs ITO 2. Per contra, the Ld. DR did not raise any objection to the seeking of withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee appellant. 3. Considering the aforesaid facts, we herein grant liberty to the assessee appellant to withdraw the captioned appeal. 4. Resultantly, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 18th March, 2026. S Sd/- Sd/- (मधुसूदन सावͫडया) (MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA) लेखासदèय/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Sd/- Sd/- (रवीश सूद) (RAVISH SOOD) ÛयाǓयकसदèय/JUDICIAL MEMBER d/- Sd Hyderabad, dated 18/03/2026 OKK/sps Printed from counselvise.com 4 ITA No. 1887/Hyd/2025 Maddula Balamurali vs ITO आदेशकȧĤǓतͧलͪपअĒेͪषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. Ǔनधा[ǐरती/The Assessee : Maddula Balamurali, #17-417-1-2-3-A, Nehru Nagar, Madanapalli, Chittoor, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh-517325. 2. राजèव/ The Revenue : Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Madanapalli O/o. Income Tax Office, Madanapalli, Chittoor, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh-517325. 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Tirupati. 4. ͪवभागीयĤǓतǓनͬध, आयकरअपीलȣयअͬधकरण /DR,ITAT, Hyderabad. 5. The Commissioner of Income Tax 6. गाड[फ़ाईल / Guard file आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Hyderabad. Printed from counselvise.com KAMALA KUMAR ORUGANTI Digitally signed by KAMALA KUMAR ORUGANTI Date: 2026.03.20 17:45:40 +05'30' "