MOHD. IRSHAD MOHD. LATIF AHMAD,NAGPUR V. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, 4(1), NAGPUR

ITA 74/NAG/2024

AI Insights

The case involves an appeal by Mohd. Irshad Mohd. Latif Ahmad against an ex-parte order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which dismissed the assessee's appeal for non-compliance and non-submission of required documents. The Tribunal noted that despite multiple opportunities provided by the CIT(A), the assessee did not respond, leading to the ex-parte decision. However, the Tribunal, prioritizing natural justice, decided to remand the case back to the CIT(A) for a fresh hearing, allowing the assessee another chance to present his case.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 24468 (ITAT-NAGPUR)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-02-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ABHAY Y. MARATHE
• Assessee Lawyers: RACHIT THAKAR
• Keywords: Set aside; Opportunity of being heard; Principle of natural justice

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER SMC MATTER ITA no.74/Nag./2024 (Assessment Year : 2015–16) Mohd. Irshad Mohd. Latif Ahmad Flat no.204, Ratan Tower no.1 Shanti nagar Road, Mahesh Nagar Nagpur 440 002 PAN – AERPA6939F ……………. Appellant v/s Income Tax Officer Ward–4(1), Nagpur ……………. Respondent Assessee by : Shri Rachit Thakar Revenue by : Shri Abhay Y. Marathe Date of Hearing – 04/02/2025 Date of Order – 10/02/2025 O R D E R This appeal preferred by the assessee is against the impugned order dated 12/01/2024, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2015–16. 2. As stated by the learned CIT(A) in its order, the assessee during the first appellate proceedings, did not file written submissions along with Form no.35. Statutory notices were issued and served electronically through the ITBA Portal. The learned CIT(A) granted multiple opportunities inasmuch as 6 opportunities were granted, but the assessee chose not to respond to any of 2 Mohd. Irshad Mohd. Latif Ahmad ITA no.74/Nag./2024 the notices issued by the learned CIT(A). Due to non-compliant attitude of the assessee, the learned CIT(A) held that the assessee is not keen in pursing the appeal and not having any documents, explanation and evidence to substantiate its case. Hence, the appeal was dismissed by passing ex-parte order. 3. Before us, the learned A.R. appearing for the assessee submitted that the learned CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order and prayed that one opportunity may be granted by restoring the matter to the file of the learned CIT(A) to enable the assessee to furnish the desired documents / evidences to substantiate its case before the learned CIT(A). 2. On the other hand, the learned D.R. submitted that despite the learned CIT(A) provided sufficient opportunities to the assessee, however, the assessee did not appear before the learned CIT(A) and not furnished relevant details. He strongly supported the orders passed by the learned CIT(A). 3. We have heard both the parties, perused the materials available on record and gone through orders of the authorities below. I find that though the learned CIT(A) granted opportunities to the assessee to substantiate its case, ultimately, the order passed by him is an ex-parte order. Therefore, I am of the opinion that by following the principles of natural justice, one opportunity should be given to the assessee to substantiate the case before the learned CIT(A). In view of the above, the order passed by the learned CIT(A) is set aside and remit the matter to the file of the learned CIT(A) and direct him to adjudicate the matter afresh on merit and in accordance with 3 Mohd. Irshad Mohd. Latif Ahmad ITA no.74/Nag./2024 law after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. It is also directed that the assessee should not seek adjournment without there being a justified reason. Accordingly, all the grounds raised by the assessee in this appeal are allowed for statistical purposes. 4. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 10/02/2025 NAGPUR, DATED: 10/02/2025 Sd/- V. DURGA RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial); (4) The DR, ITAT, Nagpur; and (5) Guard file. True Copy By Order Pradeep J. Chowdhury Sr. Private Secretary Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Nagpur "