MOIZUDDIN NAIMUDDIN SHAIKH,LATUR V. ITO WARD 1 LATUR, LATUR

ITA 1263/PUN/2025

AI Insights

The case involves Moizuddin Naimuddin Shaikh, the appellant, who faced an addition of Rs. 16,25,000 under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the assessment year 2012-2013. The addition was contested through an appeal to the CIT(A), which was dismissed due to non-compliance with hearing notices, attributed to the appellant's severe health issues and unfamiliarity with the online tax filing system. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's reasons for the delay and non-compliance, leading to the remand of the case for a fresh decision on its merits.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 774892 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 16 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-09-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 16-05-2025
• Other Referred Cases: Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Master Katiji and Others, Inder Singh Vs State of Madhya Pradesh, CIT Vs Premkumar Arjundas Luthra
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: HARSHIT BARI
• Assessee Lawyers: GIRISH LADDA
• Keywords: Reasonable cause
• Section: 144

Judgement Text

" आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण \" एस एम सी \"न्यायपीठ पुणे में । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL \"SMC\" BENCH, PUNE BEFORE Dr. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं / ITA No.1263/PUN/2025 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Moizuddin Naimuddin Shaikh, Near Kamdar Petrol Pump, Basweshwar College Road, Usmanpura, Latur- 413512 Maharashtra PAN-DKZPS4061P Vs ITO Ward-1, Latur Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Girish Ladda (Through Virtual) Revenue by : Shri Harshit Bari, Addl. CIT Date of hearing : 21.08.2025 Date of pronouncement : 01.09.2025 आदेश/ORDER PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :- This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order passed by Ld. CIT(A) NFAC, Delhi dated 28.08.2024 u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and is arising out of assessment order passed u/s 144 dated 15.09.2021. 2. Registry has informed that there is a delay of 179 days in filing of the present appeal. Application with affidavit has been filed for condonation of delay. Reasons for the delay mentioned in the affidavit are as under:- 2. That the said delay occurred due to unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances beyond my control. I am a 68-year-old senior citizen and have been suffering from malignant neoplasm of Printed from counselvise.com 2 ITA No.1263/PUN/2025 the base of the tongue (i.e., tongue cancer), diabetes, and hypertension. I underwent a wide excision surgery and right neck dissection in July 2021 at Vishwaraj Hospital, Pune, followed by adjuvant radiation therapy at Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune. I lost my ability to speak properly and it caused severe restrictions on me as nobody understands what I talk. 3. That the radiation therapy led to Grade 2 skin reactions and Grade 3 mucositis, requiring repeated hospitalizations and weekly follow-up treatments under Dr Mateen Chand Sayyed MBBS MS Registration number 2005/09/3494. I have also undergone periodic chemotherapy and whole-body PET scans. I have been under heavy medication since 2021. In addition to weekly follow ups, I have been hospitalized for 11 times in the past one year due to complications. These conditions have resulted in severe physical disability, including the inability to speak properly, and have caused immense physical and mental hardship to me and my family. 4. That I am uneducated and do not possess any knowledge regarding computers, emails, or online portals. I am entirely unfamiliar with the faceless assessment/appeal mechanism and income tax law in general. This was a one-time transaction involving purchase of land that led to the assessment. I have never filed an income tax return online, nor do I have a personal email address. My tax consultant, Mr. T. R. Bora, used his email ID to register me on the income tax portal and received all communications. Due to my medical condition and frequent hospitalizations, I was unable to follow up with him or respond to notices. 5. That I was completely unaware of the passing of the appellate order dated 28.08.2024 and came to know about the same only after receiving a phone call from the Income Tax Office, Latur, regarding a penalty notice. Thereafter, I immediately initiated steps to file the present appeal. 6. That the delay in filing the present appeal is neither intentional nor due to any malafide intention. The same is solely attributable to the extraordinary and critical medical conditions prevailing in my life, as explained hereinabove. 7. In view of the foregoing, I most respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to condone the delay of 197 days in filing the present appeal, in the interest of justice and equity. 8. That the contents of this affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge and belief. No part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed there from. 3. From going through the above affidavit and considering the submissions made by Ld. Departmental Representative Printed from counselvise.com 3 ITA No.1263/PUN/2025 (DR) we find that the reasonable cause has prevented the assessee from filing the appeal in time. Placing reliance on the judgement of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Master Katiji and Others(1987) 167 ITR 471(SC) and in the case of Inder Singh Vs State of Madhya Pradesh judgement dated 21.03.2025 (2025) INSC 382) and taking a justice oriented approach we hereby condone the delay of 179 days and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. At the outset Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that due to unavoidable circumstances assessee failed to respond to the notices of hearing issued by Ld. CIT(A) on 09.07.2024 and 29.07.2024 resulting in the dismissal of appeal. Prayer made for providing one more opportunity. On the other hand Ld. Departmental Representative (DR) supported the observations of the Assessing Officer as well as finding of Ld. CIT(A). 5. We have heard rival contentions and perused the record placed before us. The assessee is an individual and has been assessed u/s 144 r.w.s 254 r.w.s 144B of the Act and in the order dated 15.09.2021 an addition of Rs. 16,25,000/- u/s 69 has been made and against this addition assessee preferred appeal before Ld. CIT(A) on 02.11.2021. But thereafter on the given dates of hearing on few occasions assessee seeked adjournment but on the last 2 occasions made no compliance resulting in dismissal of appeal. We note that Ld. CIT(A) has merely affirmed the finding of Ld. AO without dealing with the merits of the case. 6. Under these given facts and circumstances and being fair to both the parties we deem it proper to restore the issues raised on merits in the instant appeal to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for necessary adjudication. Further Ld. CIT(A) shall pass a Printed from counselvise.com 4 ITA No.1263/PUN/2025 speaking order as per the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble High Court in the case of CIT Vs Premkumar Arjundas Luthra 240 Taxman 133 (Bom HC) and decide in accordance with law. Needless to mention that proper opportunity of hearing shall be granted to the assessee. Assessee is also directed to remain vigilant and not to take adjournment unless otherwise required for reasonable cause. Effective grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. 7. In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on this 01st day of September, 2025. Sd/- Sd/- (VINAY BHAMORE) (MANISH BORAD) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे/ Pune; दििांक / Dated: 01st September, 2025. Neeta आिेश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधर्ि / Copy of the Order forwarded to: 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant. 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. The Pr. CIT concerned. 4. धवभागीय प्रधिधिधि, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, \"SMC\" बेंच, पुणे / DR, ITAT, \"SMC\" Bench, Pune. 5. गार्ा फाइल / Guard File. आिेशािुसार / BY ORDER, Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune. Printed from counselvise.com "