DIREC.GEN.OF INCOME TAX INVES.andORS V. THE CENTRAL INFORMATION COMM. and ANR.

WPC/3125/2009

AI Insights

The case involves a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, where the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The respondents included various directors of income tax and the Central Information Commission. The matter was presented before Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhirendra Mishra. The core legal issue was the procedural correctness of allowing a withdrawal of a writ petition. The court examined the application for withdrawal and noted the absence of opposition to the withdrawal from the respondents, leading to the dismissal of the petitioner's application to withdraw the writ petition.

• Counselvise Citation: [2009] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 726513 (HC-MADHYA_PRADESH)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 25-09-2009
• Assessment Year: misc
• Laws Referred To: Constitution of India
• Result in Favour of: Others
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Department Lawyers: M P S BHATIA
• Assessee Lawyers: M R R SINHA
• Keywords: Withdrawal of writ petition; Misplaced jurisdiction
• Section: 226

Judgement Text

"c h ; H o n ' b ! e M r . J u s f i c e D h i r e n d r a M i s h r a ) W . P . ( C ) N o . ’ 3 1 2 5 / 2 0 0 9 ( P e T i ‘ r i o n U / A 2 2 6 o f T h e C o n s T i ’ r u ’ r i o n o f I n d i a ) S 1 . D i r e c ’ r o r > G e n e r ‘ a l o f I n c o m e T a x ( I n v e s f i g a f i o n ) , A a y k d r B h a w a n , H o s h a n g a b a d R o a d , B H O P A L ( M P ) D i r e c f o r o f I n c o m e T a x ( I n v e s t i g m ‘ i o n ) , A a y k a r B h a w a n , H o s h a n g a b a d R o a d , B H O P A L ( N P ) 3 . A d d i f i o n a l D i r e c ’ r o r ‘ o f I n c o m e T a x ( I n v e s t i g a ’ r i o n ) , C e n f r a l R e v e n u e B u i l d i n g , C i v i l L i n e s , R u i p u r ‘ ( C G ) V s T S 1 . T h e C e n f r ‘ a l I n f o r m a ‘ r i o n C o m m i s s i o n , 2 “ F l o o r , B — W i n g , A u g u s f K r ‘ a n i ' i B h a w a n , B h i k a j i C o m a P l a c e , N e w D e l h i 1 1 0 0 6 6 2 . S h r ‘ i A m a r p r ‘ e e ’ r S i n g h C h a n d o k , V I P R o a d , D r . R a j e n d r a P r a s a d W o r d , R a i p u r ' ( C G ) M . R R . S i n h a , A d v o c a ‘ r e f o r ’ r h e p e ’ r i ’ r i o n e r s . M r ‘ . M . P . S . B h a t i a , A d v o c a ' r e f o r r e s p o n d e n ’ r N o . 2 . O r ' a l O r d e r ( 2 5 . 0 9 . 2 0 0 9 ) . H e a o n I . A . N o . 3 , a p p l i c a t i o n f o r w i f h d r a w a l o f w r i f p e f i f i o n . 1 r d 2 . N o ’ r o p p o s e d . 3 T h e d . p e ’ r i ‘ r i o n i s i s m i s s e d a s w i ‘ r h d r a w n . S d / - D h i r e n d r a M i s h r a ‘ J u d g e ( S i n q l e B e n P E T I T I O N E R . R E S P O N D E N P r e s e n t r . : ’ "