NABIUL INDUSTRIAL METAL PVT. LTD.,PASCHIM MEDINIPUR V. I.T.O., WARD - 39(2), MIDNAPORE, PASCHIM MEDINIPUR

ITA 1328/KOL/2024

AI Insights

Nabiul Industrial Metal Pvt. Ltd. appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) - NFAC, Delhi, which arose from an assessment order framed under sections 147/144/144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case originated when the assessee did not file a return for AY 2017-18, leading to a re-assessment based on information about bogus entries linked to the company. The Assessing Officer added Rs. 15,00,000 to the income under section 68 of the Act, which was contested in the CIT(A) and subsequently in the Tribunal. The primary legal contention was the improper assumption of jurisdiction by the NFAC before the notification date of 29.03.2022, which was crucial for the faceless assessment scheme.

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 36245 (ITAT-KOLKATA)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-10-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Appeal Filed On: 13-06-2024
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Bogus
• Section: 147; 148; 142(1); 250; 68

Judgement Text

"आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण कोलकाता 'एसएमसी' पीठ, कोलकाता में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA श्री राजेश क ुमार, लेखा सदस्य एवं श्री प्रदीप क ुमार चौबे, न्याधयक सदस्य क े समक्ष Before SRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.: 1328/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Nabiul Industrial Metal Pvt. Ltd………………………………………..Appellant [PAN: AAECN 3170 B] Vs. ITO, IT Department, NFAC, Delhi.……....................................Respondent Appearances: Assessee represented by: S.K. Tulsiyan, Adv. Department represented by: Anindya Kumar Bandopadhyay, Addl. CIT. Date of concluding the hearing : August 5th, 2024 Date of pronouncing the order : October 15th, 2024 ORDER Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member: This appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to the Assessment Year (in short ‘AY’) 2017-18 is directed against the order passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the ‘Act’) by ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)- NFAC, Delhi [in short ld. ‘CIT(A)’] dated 27.05.2024 arising out of the assessment order framed u/s 147/144/144B of the Act dated 31.03.2022. 1.1. The brief facts of the case of the appellant are that the assessee Nabiul Industrial Metal Pvt. Ltd. did not file the return of income for the AY 2017-18 as a result of which case of the assessee was re-opened u/s 147 of the Act. I.T.A. No.: 1328/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Nabiul Industrial Metal Pvt. Ltd. Page 2 of 7 The Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as ld. 'AO') received information from the investigation wing, Kolkata wherein it was mentioned that in course of the investigation in the case of M/s. Darsh Coke Trading Pvt. Ltd., it was revealed that the said company is a paper company through which entry operators provide bogus entries and layer money in exchange of commission. It was also found that the one of the beneficiaries is the assessee company which has received Rs. 15,00,000/- from a paper concern namely Tanishi Commotrades Pvt. Ltd. During the course of re-assessment, the assessee was asked to explain the transactions with Tanishi Commotrades Pvt. Ltd. In response, the assessee submitted that in the current year i.e. FY 2016-17 the assessee took a loan/ advance from this party against sale of goods and in the immediately succeeding year i.e. FY 2017-18 sales were made to Tanishi Commotrades Pvt. Ltd and said sale was duly credited in the Profit and Loss account of the company and tax was duly paid. However, the AO was not convinced with the submission filed by the assessee and accordingly, added the sum of Rs. 15,00,000/- to the income of the assessee u/s 68 of the Act. The said assessment order has been challenged before the ld. CIT(A) wherein in absence of any response from the appellant the case of the assessee has been dismissed. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order, the present appeal has been preferred. 1.2. The ld. Counsel for the assessee challenges the impugned order by taking several grounds but he, in course of hearing, took an additional ground being the legal ground and he pressed only legal ground which are as follows: “That the National Faceless Assessment Centre erred in having assumed jurisdiction u/s 151A r.w.s 144B of the Act from 29.11.2021 when they were not empowered under any notification about the applicability of the faceless scheme for making assessment in faceless manner prior to 29.03.2022.” 1.3. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the provisions of Section 151A of the Act came in the statute on 01.11.2021 but it was notified with effect from 29.03.2022. But in the present case, assessment proceedings to I.T.A. No.: 1328/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Nabiul Industrial Metal Pvt. Ltd. Page 3 of 7 the NFAC started on 29.11.2021 which is evident from the notice u/s 142(1) of the Act. Ld. Counsel for the assessee further submits that the show cause notice has also been issued and the date has been mentioned as 28.03.2022 that is prior to 29.03.2022. Ld. Counsel for the assessee further submits that the assumption of jurisdiction by the NFAC was without jurisdiction. Consequently, the whole assessment is without jurisdiction and unsustainable in law. Ld. Counsel for the assessee further drew the attention of this Bench on the issuance of show cause notice and submitted that it was served on 29.03.2022 and asked the assessee to furnish explanation on or before 29.03.2022, it means without giving the assessee any opportunity before framing of the assessment order. Ld. Counsel for the assessee has filed the following papers: a) Notification of Ministry of Finance dated 29.03.2022. b) Notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. c) Show cause notice dated 28.03.2022. 1.4. Ld. D/R though supports the impugned order but did not raise any objection on the legal ground. 2. We have perused the records and the papers filed by the assessee. It appears that Notification with respect to Section 151A of the Act has been made with effect from 29.03.2022 which is as under: “S.O. 1466(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 151A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby makes the following Scheme, namely:- 1. Short title and commencement.—(1) This Scheme may be called the e- Assessment of Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022. (2) It shall come into force with effect from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette. 2. Definitions.—(1) In this Scheme, unless the context otherwise requires, — (a) “Act” means the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961); (b) “automated allocation” means an algorithm for randomised allocation of cases, by using suitable technological tools, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, with a view to optimise the use of resources. I.T.A. No.: 1328/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Nabiul Industrial Metal Pvt. Ltd. Page 4 of 7 (2) Words and expressions used herein and not defined, but defined in the Act, shall have the meaning respectively assigned to them in the Act. 3. Scope of the Scheme.—For the purpose of this Scheme,— (a) assessment, reassessment or re-computation under section 147 of the Act, (b) issuance of notice under section 148 of the Act, shall be through automated allocation, in accordance with risk management strategy formulated by the Board as referred to in section 148 of the Act for issuance of notice, and in a faceless manner, to the extent provided in section 144B of the Act with reference to making assessment or reassessment of total income or loss of assessee.” 2.1. We have also gone through the notice u/s 142(1) of the Act dated 29.11.2021 which is as follows: 2.2. We further find the show cause notice issued that also reflects the date 28.03.2022 which is as follows: I.T.A. No.: 1328/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Nabiul Industrial Metal Pvt. Ltd. Page 5 of 7 ……………………………… I.T.A. No.: 1328/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Nabiul Industrial Metal Pvt. Ltd. Page 6 of 7 2.3. It appears from the show cause notice issued on 28.03.2022 that at the bottom of the page it was digitally signed thereby giving date 29.03.2022 at 00:20:37 IST. 2.4. We further find that in the show cause notice the assessee has been directed to furnish explanation on or before 29.03.2022. It is surprising that when it was issued on 29.03.2022 at 00:20:37 IST and directed the assessee to explain the explanation before 29.03.2022. 3. Keeping in view the entire facts and discussions made above, we find substance in the argument of the ld. CIT(A) that assumption of jurisdiction prior to 29.03.2022 by the ld. AO is to be held to be without jurisdiction. Accordingly, the assessment order, passed, is to be deemed without I.T.A. No.: 1328/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Nabiul Industrial Metal Pvt. Ltd. Page 7 of 7 jurisdiction. Subsequently, all the orders passed are hereby held to be without jurisdiction. 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 15th October, 2024. Sd/- Sd/- [Rajesh Kumar] [Pradip Kumar Choubey] Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 15.10.2024 Bidhan (P.S.) Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Nabiul Industrial Metal Pvt. Ltd., Vill & PO - Dhadimba, Kharagpur, Paschim Medinipur, West Bengal, 721301. 2. ITO, IT Department, NFAC, Delhi. 3. CIT(A)-NFAC, Delhi. 4. CIT- 5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata. //True copy // By order Assistant Registrar ITAT, Kolkata Benches Kolkata "