NANDASAN JUTH KELAVANI MANDAL,MEHSANA V. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- EXEMPTION, PALANPUR

ITA 1591/AHD/2024

AI Insights

The case involves two appeals filed by Nandasan Juth Kelavani Mandal, a public charitable trust, against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) for the assessment years 2016-17 and 2018-19. The primary contention was the lack of opportunity for the assessee to be heard, which was claimed to be in violation of the principles of natural justice and equity. The assessee argued that the appeals were dismissed without proper adjudication on merits, leading to unjust penalties and additions to income. The Income Tax Officer had completed the assessments under sections 147 and 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to non-filing of returns by the assessee, which was contested in the appeals.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 473910 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-01-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RIGNESH DAS
• Assessee Lawyers: ANIL KSHATRIYA
• Keywords: Set aside; Opportunity of being heard; Principle of natural justice; Charitable institution
• Section: 144; 250

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR. BRR KUMAR, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI TR SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.TA. No.1625/Ahd/2024 & I.T.A No.1591/Ahd/2024 (Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2018-19) Nandasan Juth Kelavani Mandal, At Nandasan, Post Nandasan, Tal. Kadi, Dist. Mehsana, Gujarat-382705. Vs. The Income Tax Officer, (Exemption), Palanpur. [PAN No.AAATN6614R] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Anil Kshatriya, AR Respondent by: Shri Rignesh Das, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 30.12.2024 Date of Pronouncement 03.01.2025 O R D E R PER: DR. BRR KUMAR, VICE PRESIDENT: The captioned two appeals have been filed by the Assessee against the separate orders passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), Delhi vide order dated 16.07.2024 & 12.07.2024 passed for the Assessment Years 2016-17 & 2018-19. 2. The Assessee has taken the following grounds of appeals in ITA No. 1591/Ahd/2024 for AY 2018-19. ITA Nos. 1625 & 1591/Ahd/2024 Asst.Years –2016-17 & 2018-19 - 2– 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Order so passed by the Ld. CIT(A) NFAC is bad in law, illegal, besides being in violation of the principle of natural justices & equity, as having been passed without affording any opportunity of being heard by issuance of notice of hearing or calling for considering material facts narrated at Column no. 14 & 15 of Form No. 35 and further by not adjudicating the appeal on its merit; as such liable to be quashed and set aside. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) NFAC has grossly erred in dismissing grounds of appeal so raised before him and not adjudicating the appeal on merits and thereby, further erred in denying justice, without any justification. As a consequent, penalty of Rs.2,97,800/- levied/u/s.272A(2)(e) of the Act may kindly be deleted. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend and/or withdraw any of the grounds or ground of appeal either before or at the time of appeal hearing. 3. The Assessee has taken the following grounds of appeals in ITA No. 1625/Ahd/2024 for AY 2016-17. 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Order so passed by the Ld. CIT(A) NFAC is bad in law, illegal, besides being in violation of the principle of natural justices & equity, as having been passed without affording any opportunity of being heard by issuance of notice of hearing as mandated under sub-section (1) of section 250 of the I.T. Act, 1961 ('Act' in short). 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) NFAC has grossly erred in dismissing grounds of appeal so raised before him or calling for considering material facts narrated at Column no. 14 & 15 of Form No. 35 and further by not adjudicating the appeal on its merit; as such liable to be quashed and set aside. 3. The Ld. CIT(A) has further erred in denying justice, without any justification. As a consequence, addition of Rs.63,26,778/- representing unexplained money u/s.69 of the Act so made by the AO may kindly deleted or denovo restored backed to the filed of JAO for fresh adjudication with a permission to adduce adequate evidences on record and reasonable opportunity of being heard. ITA Nos. 1625 & 1591/Ahd/2024 Asst.Years –2016-17 & 2018-19 - 3– The appellant raves leave to add, alter, amend and/or withdraw any of the grounds or ground of appeal either before or at the time of appeal hearing. 4. The facts of the case are that the assessee is a Public Charitable Trust running education institute from 2006. The assessee has been duly recognized for purpose of exemption u/s.80G of the Income tax Act, 1961. The appellant income for the year under consideration was ‘Nil’ and did not filed return of income u/s.139 of the Act. Therefore, the AO completed the assessment u/s.147 r.w.s 144 of the Act on 28.12.2023, determining total income at Rs.63,26,778/- 5. At the outset, the Ld.Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee-trust is being situated at the remote areas and therefore the assessee could not comply with the notices genuinely without any malafide intention. It was submitted that the Ld.CIT(A) has also not admitted appeal filed by the assessee owing to the delay and prayed that given an opportunity, due compliance will be made by the assessee before the Ld.CIT(A). The Ld. DR fairly submitted that since the primary adjudication has not been undertaken by the Revenue Authorities, the matter be remanded to Ld. CIT(A). Hence, keeping in view the submissions of both the parties, the appeal of the assessee is hereby remanded to Ld. CIT(A) to adjudicate on merits of the case. 6. In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. ITA Nos. 1625 & 1591/Ahd/2024 Asst.Years –2016-17 & 2018-19 - 4– ITA No.1625/Ahd/2024 for AY 2016-17 7. We have examined the facts on record. The Ld. DR submitted that in the fitness of the things the matter may be restored to the file of Ld. CIT(A), with costs. We find that the prayer of the revenue to remand the matter to the Ld. CIT(A) is acceptable. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee has agreed to pay a cost of Rs.2000/- on account of non-compliance before the revenue authorities. Since the primary adjudication has not been done by the first appellate authority, we direct the Ld.CIT(A) to condone the delay and pass the order on merits of case. 8. In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. This Order pronounced in Open Court on 03.01.2025 Sd/- Sd/- (TR SENTHI KUMAR) (DR. BRR KUMAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT (True Copy) Ahmedabad; Dated 03 .01.2025 Manish, Sr. PS TRUE COPY आदेश कᳱ ᮧितिलिप अᮕेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant 2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयुᲦ / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयुᲦ(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीय ᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाडᭅ फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / ITAT, Ahmedabad "