OM TAPOVAN CHARITABLE TRUST,ANKLESHWAR V. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

ITA 223/SRT/2025

AI Insights

The case involves the Om Tapovan Charitable Trust, which sought approval under section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to qualify for tax exemptions. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) rejected the application, categorizing the Trust as a religious-cum-charitable entity due to its objectives, which included religious activities such as maintaining temples and celebrating religious festivals. The Tribunal referenced a previous similar case involving the same Trust and upheld the rejection, emphasizing that the Trust's objectives did not align with the requirements of section 80G(5)(iii) as they included religious purposes.

• Counselvise Citation: [2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 834145 (ITAT-SURAT)
• Duration Of Justice: 11 month(s) 9 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-02-2026
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 24-02-2025
• Other Referred Cases: Yug Chetna Parmarth Trust vs. CIT
• Laws Referred To: Income-tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MUKESH JAIN
• Assessee Lawyers: YOGESH SHAH
• Keywords: Charitable institution
• Section: 12A; 80G

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 223/SRT/2025 (Assessment Year: - ) Om Tapovan Charitable Trust, Vill: Borbhatha (Bet), Nr. Golden Bridge, Ankleshwar - 393001 [PAN : AAATO 2047 D] Vs. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions), Ahmedabad (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Yogesh Shah, AR Respondent by: Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT-DR Date of Hearing 23.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement 03.02.2026 O R D E R PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:- The captioned appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Ld. CIT (E)’ for short), vide order dated 21.02.2023, rejecting the application filed by the assessee in Form No. 10AB for approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act” for short). 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee-trust filed an application in Form No. 10AB seeking approval under section 80G(5)(iii) of the Act. Upon examination of the objects of the trust as contained in its instrument of creation, the Ld. CIT(E) observed that the objects include religious purposes, such as carrying out religious activities, celebration of religious festivals, and maintenance of temples etc. On the basis of such objects, the Ld. CIT(E) categorised the assessee as a composite trust, i.e., a religious-cum-charitable trust, and rejected the application holding that the assessee did not fulfil the essential Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 223/SRT/2025 Om Tapovan Charitable Trust Vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year : - - 2– condition prescribed u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Act, namely that the institution should not be established for the benefit of any particular religion. 3. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(E), the assessee filed the preset appeal before the Tribunal. 4. At the outset, we note that an identical issue came up for consideration before the Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in assessee’s own case in ITA No. 175/Ahd/2023 for AY 2022-23, wherein vide order dated 17.05.2024, the Tribunal upheld the rejection of approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act, with following observations:- “3. The facts in brief are that the assessee, a charitable trust, runs an ashram where people can engage in yoga, yagna (havan), and shibirs. The assessee trust was established with various objects such as running charity kitchen, medical camp, assistance to economically weaker people, assistance in imparting education etc. as well as to carry out religious activity& celebration, maintenance of temple etc. The assessee trust was registered under section 12A of the Act w.e.f. 31-05-2021. 4. Subsequently, the assessee trust applied for the approval of trust under section 80G(5) of the Act vide application dated 10-08-2022 before the ld. CIT(Exemption). The learned CIT(Exemption) found that the application of the assessee contains nature of activity as “Religious cum Charitable” and further para/row 5 of the application in form (From-10AB) mentions object as “religious”. The learned CIT(Exemption) further notices that object clause 22 of the trust deed also contains object to carry out religious activity, to make and maintain temple, to celebrate religious festival. The learned CIT(Exemption) was of the view, as per the provisions of section 80G(2)(iv)(a) read with section 80G(5)(ii) & (iii) of the Act, that: i. The fund/institution should be created for charitable purposes. ii. The rules governing the institution should not contain any provision for transfer or application of funds for the purpose other than charitable purpose. Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 223/SRT/2025 Om Tapovan Charitable Trust Vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year : - - 3– iii. The object of the institution should not express to be for the benefit of any religion or caste. iv. The learned CIT(Exemption) further observed that the provision of section 80G(5B) provides that notwithstanding to the Explanation 3 and section 80G(5)(ii) of the Act provides that the expenses incurred for religious purpose if less than 5% of gross receipts, then it shall be deemed that there is no contravention of the provisions of section 80G of the Act. v. However, the assessee to avail the benefit of the provisions of section 80G(5B) of the Act is required to establish that its activities are only for charitable purposes. 5. However, in the case of the assessee trust, the object clause expressly contains religious purposes. Hence, the application of the assessee for approval under section 80G of the Act was rejected by the learned CIT(Exemption). 6. Being aggrieved by the order of the learned CIT(Exemption), the assessee is in appeal before us. 7. The learned AR before us filed a paper book running from pages 1 to 32 and contended that it has not incurred any expense relating to religious activity and therefore the assessee should be allowed the registration as per the amended provisions of section 80G(5B) of the Act. 8. On the other hand, the learned DR submitted that the assessee can be allowed the benefit of the provisions of amended section 80G(5B) of the Act provided that its objects are only charitable in nature and while carrying out charitable activities, it has incurred some expenses which are of religious nature but the same should not exceed 5% of the gross receipts. But in the given case, one of the objects of the assessee is of religious nature and therefore the application of the assessee is hit by clause (iii) of section 80G(5) of the Act which has not been overridden by the amended provisions of section 80G(5B) of the Act. The learned DR permanently supported the order of the learned CIT exemption. 9. We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the materials available on record. The amended provisions of section 80G(5B) of Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 223/SRT/2025 Om Tapovan Charitable Trust Vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year : - - 4– the Act have overridden the provisions of sub-clause (ii) of section 80G(5) of the Act and the explanation 3 of section 80G of the Act but it has not overridden subclause (iii) of section 80G(5) of the Act which requires that the assessee should not have any object in the deed relating to the religious activity. In the present case, admittedly one of the objects in the deed is of a religious nature as observed by the ld. CIT exemption discussed above and, therefore we are of the view that the assessee is not eligible for registration under section 80G(5) of the Act. In holding so, we draw support and guidance from the order of ITAT in the case of Yug Chetna Parmarth Trust vs. CIT reported in 44 taxmann.com 446 wherein it was held as under: “Section 80G(5B) is also not in contravention of provisions of section 80G(5) because it clarifies the position that the assessee trust when incurred expenditure on religious activities, which is less than 5% of the total income would be deemed to be Institution or fund, to which the provisions of this section apply. The small percentage of amount not exceeding 5 per cent provided in this section clearly proves that the assessee shall have to establish on record that it existed and established for charitable purpose only and while incurring the expenditure during any previous year, which is of a religious nature for an amount not exceeding to 5 per cent of its total income for that previous year, shall be deemed to be an Institution or fund to which the provisions of section shall apply. The benefit of section 80G(5B) is provided to limited extent to the Institution or trust or fund, established for charitable purpose only when it incurs expenditure on religious activities not exceeding 5 per cent of its total income in that previous year however, this provision does not say that the assessee trust or fund should not exist or establish for charitable purpose.” 10. The facts of the case on hand are identical to the facts of the case cited above. Therefore, we are of the view that the assessee is not eligible for registration under section 80G(5) of the Act. Accordingly, we do not find any reason to interfere in the finding of the learned CIT exemption and thus we uphold the same. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed. ” Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 223/SRT/2025 Om Tapovan Charitable Trust Vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year : - - 5– 5. On careful consideration of the facts of the present case, we find that the factual matrix remains identical to that considered by the Co-ordinate Bench in the assessee’s own case for the earlier assessment year. No change in the objects of the trust, no amendment to the trust deed, and no change in the applicable legal provisions have been brought to our notice so as to persuade us to take a different view. Respectfully following the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench in assessee’s own case (supra), and in the absence of any distinguishing facts or contrary legal position, we find no infirmity in the order passed by the Ld. CIT(E). 6. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open Court on 03.02.2026 Sd/- Sd/- (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) (DR. B.R.R. KUMAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE-PRESIDENT Ahmedabad ; Dated 03/02/2026 btk आदेश की \u0007ितिलिप अ ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ\u0011 / The Appellant 2. \u0007\u0012थ\u0011 / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु\u001a / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु\u001a ) अपील ( / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीय \u0007ितिनिध , अिधकरण अपीलीय आयकर , /DR,ITAT, Surat, 6. गाड! फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, TRUE COPY सहायक पंजीकार (Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ITAT, Surat Printed from counselvise.com "