" - 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51173 WP No. 7984 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 7984 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN: 1. PRATHMIKA KRUSHI PATTINA SAHAKARA SANGA NIYAMITHA KANASAPURA KANASAPURA POST CHIKAMAGALUR TALUK CHIKAMAGALUR – 577 146. KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KALASAPURA SHIVALINGAPPA RENUKA …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANANTHA SWAMY G.R, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI – 110 001. 2. OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 003. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Printed from counselvise.com Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51173 WP No. 7984 of 2025 3. OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, CHIKKAMAGALURU INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA 4. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTER 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM NEW DELHI - 110 003. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER 5. ASSESSMENT UNIT INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, REGIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTER BENGALURU - 560 500. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M THIRUMALESH, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 25/03/2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 I.E., ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD-1, CHIKKAMAGALUR VIDE DIN ITBA/AST/F/148A /2021-22/1041507923(1) UNDER SECTION 148A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR Printed from counselvise.com - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51173 WP No. 7984 of 2025 ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be disposed of as withdrawn. 2. The submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn, reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to take recourse to such remedies as available in law including filing a fresh writ petition. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BSS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4 Printed from counselvise.com "