RAMHET SINGH,GWALIOR V. INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(2) GWALIOR, GWALIOR

ITA 87/AGR/2025

AI Insights

The case involves an appeal by Ramhet Singh against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), which dismissed his appeal ex parte concerning an assessment order that added Rs. 17,00,000 to his income under section 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The primary contention was the alleged violation of the principles of natural justice, as the appellant claimed he was not given adequate opportunity to defend his case. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal found that the CIT(Appeals) had not properly stated the points for determination or the reasons for the decision, as required under section 250(6) of the Act. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the previous orders and remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 396758 (ITAT-AGRA)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 29-05-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Laws Referred To: Income-tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Matter Remanded
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SHAILENDRA SRIVASTAVA
• Assessee Lawyers: MANUJ SHARMA
• Keywords: Set aside; Principle of natural justice
• Section: 144; 69

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AGRA BENCH, AGRA BEFORE : SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 87/Agr/2025 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Ramhet Singh, Shri Vihar Colony, Near Ganesh Mandir, Ghosipura, Gwalior (MP). Vs. Income-tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Gwalior. PAN : ABNPY2597E (Appellant) (Respondent) ORDER Per Sunil Kumar Singh, Judicial Member: This appeal has been preferred by assessee against the impugned order dated 24.12.2024 passed in Appeal No. CIT (A), Gwalior/10382/2019-20 by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi u/s. 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), wherein the learned CIT(Appeals) has dismissed assessee’s first appeal ex parte against the assessment order dated 23.11.2019, according to which, Rs.17,00,000/- were added in assessee’s income u/s. 69 of the Act.. Assessee by Sh. Manuj Sharma, Advocate Department by Sh. Shailendra Srivastava, Sr. DR Date of hearing 21.05.2025 Date of pronouncement 29.05.2025 ITA No.87/Agr/2025 2 | P a g e 2. This appeal has been filed on the ground, in addition to other grounds, that the ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in passing the impugned order without affording proper and adequate opportunity to the appellant/assessee to defend its case. 3. Perused the records and heard the ld. Representative for the assessee and the learned Departmental Representative for the Revenue. 4. Learned AR has submitted that the ld. CIT(Appeals) has not followed the principles of natural justice while dismissing the appeal of the assessee ex parte. 5. Learned DR has supported the impugned order. 6. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the assessee did not respond to the notices issued on 17.01.2021, 09.09.2022, 01.12.2023, 21.12.2023 and 10.12.2024 issued by the first appellate authority for making compliance on various dates, resulting in passing ex parte impugned order. The learned CIT(Appeals) was, however, expected to state the points for determination, decision thereon and the reasons for the decision as provided u/s. 250(6) of the Act, which is lacking in the impugned order. This apart, we also notice that the assessee also failed to make submissions before the Assessing Officer resulting in passing assessment u/s. 144 of the Act. This irresponsive conduct of the assessee cannot be appreciated. For want of assessee’s explanation, the source of ITA No.87/Agr/2025 3 | P a g e payments of Rs.17,00,000/- made against purchase of property by the appellant could not be explained before the learned Assessing Officer. In the circumstances and in the interest of justice and fair play, we deem it just and appropriate to remit the matter back to the file of learned Assessing Officer for framing the assessment order afresh after seeking explanation of the assessee as to the source of the aforesaid payment. We order accordingly. We further direct the assessee to be diligent and cooperative in attending the assessment proceedings and making submissions before the Assessing Officer for the expeditious and effective disposal. Assessee shall refrain from seeking any adjournment but for compelling and unavoidable reasons. Needless to say that learned Assessing Officer shall ensure the observance of the principles of natural justice. The appeal is liable to be allowed accordingly. 7. In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Impugned order dated 24.02.2024 and assessment order dt. 23.11.2019 are set aside. Order pronounced in the open court on 29.05.2025. Sd/- Sd/- (MANISH AGARWAL) (SUNIL KUMAR SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 29.05.2025 *aks/- ITA No.87/Agr/2025 4 | P a g e Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Agra "