AI Insights
The case revolves around a writ petition filed by the petitioner, who is also a defendant in a related civil suit, seeking a writ of mandamus against multiple respondents for their alleged involvement in fraudulent real estate transactions and subsequent money laundering and tax evasion. The petitioner contended that these transactions were facilitated by the respondents in collusion with government officials, involving the manipulation of official records. The High Court, however, found that the issues raised were already subject to a civil suit and that the petitioner had not substantiated his claims sufficiently to warrant the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. The court emphasized the need to avoid using the writ jurisdiction to conduct a detailed investigation into allegations that could be addressed in the civil suit.
Appeal Details
Counselvise Citation
[2021] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 677319 (HC-TELANGANA)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
CRN Number
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Others
Pronouncement Date
29-01-2021
Assessment Year
misc
Judgement Text
"l HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA \"'-.' - - (Sp\"\"ial Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M,S'RAMACHANDRA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Between: WRIT PETITION O: 701 OF2021 ) i,.t i t.l.?lt il,,i.i':l , i,;i r'r i, i ttir, :i;l'.:r 1,3.r il,: i:: . i rjflillii J I'rtiil :i:j i)!! iri,tir,!+.i'Jl i'1,:]f1a{1,nqii i{.i-.iir1,i1i-l I tr l^ ii.{41 :;..,4i iit:'3! {r.l;rrr'i itlirr, i':,\".,.i -, .' :t':.t ll,'ir ii.lJt}. l -i,j-. r:,t:ti,'1,, l'.:r i.),J.r':i.1.. i\"i.i1J . ii.1:{r.:i?,:l i ! , i -- r i;-- i a : r s i'l 1 rrt i ir.!. art., ji:... i'ir l i I :; i_.j i-r! r- !it\", !!' i,.. .,,r i i,i.r'i l.;:ir,1.rr:,:::tirr'iirr .!' j.,..,r.., , , ,.,.'...,,. -l -.; ii,r.;.-r .:. \" it-r' i.rt*t_ii=a li..'1tir.t ;1.,Ji:t - 1lr,' 1i:, t I r,!: :. .,'.r.r i ,11 irli.',iii\" iii i ii!,.1'r, rr,r'I\", !:r;y:r;|, ,;iltli tl.f irt rfl '-r -11 : ',,ii i..:.1.. !1 .:.-. rl/,il- jii': i.i,:!ir,.- i I iil; ii1,. :1 i i: 1 ,r,. rir I:i ,t-ii 1.1.: ilrj!rl,;,,i r!;-i.,if f ,i. i1,ii,, j i j;, irlii ;rtr.ir,. .f,_ .,:.,:; i 1ii.:r-i:' r'r , i:r i tr r Ll!rtl i, ! lfr.-. irt.\"t l,rtl 1 I t \"r i €llt l'li r.lan lir:liirl r il,i* i,rjrtr,.,r!! ljir !ji 1L!r'r llrrtii:t,ir-.r ir\". .,,1 , .4!jltr_! i.l i:r-:ni li,!-,rr :- l:r,a li.lrtriJi i..-,,i.1. ll.,:i, r ..r:,',r ^ l:.: r t rir i-*rtrii i: l;Il; i 3r irll,r v:i{i . i ii r:r . lr,:i. irF.,.r I\":i!, 11,!:r' !:,-, ::1..+a, ,,i t..t.;tt,;.:tl-- a-+r: t,.i, i,r:rri , t *,,,,,,r,-. ';i ]l_- ii,--, r::f ii i::r . !ilrilrtrr-_il:!i!1. -r t ':i 'le I an{;an< iierlt*i:r +ir_.) i;ir .i,rit !,!rinrp*, l* !.1r.)11..,1!i-_i, I i ii{r 1,,, | ,.i. ' :r!11r.-,ri.-:- rl.r..:iJ,-, I i .r, -i . I r. r :1 I t :! I ; . iii.+ l:r.:+l-. rr r i ,:i , I I I !,, 1. t- r1 I r I,iall.:;1:r-.1 tlr-rri {il tr{i.,r l r , ,. , t : r . . . : i , , 1 . !rial1 }Ji,l l-, Lli,i:r\" + ,;!- lJ, I:::^ 1j. 14 - The Serious Frauds I nve15 trga tr(]n Of +ice , 4th F t onr , Corpora te Bf'ra van . $urvey No. 1?;7/1r -l-hattranarirn (V) . fJand laguda, l-k1ya thnagar [l!.and3 I . R-f{ Dastrict. reP by r\"t = Arldltlonnl Direc to.' . The Deputy Co.lltrlrss:.oner t]? Piflrt:e! Di ,.i,sron Cr Eentral ErLrle $tJtr.on! Fateh lraidan fload, $aif aEad ! Hyderalrad. Syed Al:htar 5./r] S/o Lste l.niirr Agect- 66 Yrs, l{/o H.No. 9-4-dA/Lgr Ni=am Colonyr Toli Chosrki, 60lcontta' Hyderabsd-Br Occ- MIE S. A Eui tdars & tle ve l{3pers. Sukesh GuPta Slo Pral.:ash Chand liuFta. Aqed. l'1a -ior , R/o C/o l\"lt.lsaddi la I Jewe I Lers \" EIite Plasar H.No- 5-3*67ilr Parjagutta Ofiicers CoIorry. So(rla jrglrda. Flyderibadt Occ . l\"lBS Jeue I lers . M/E 6ehna Pro.it3cts (pYt) Ltd.' kegd Uftrce at H.No. 5-9-45. Ea5heerbaQhr Hyderabadr rep by i-t's Orrertor- Suliegh tiupta. ll{]ha rn,rEd l'to r zudrl rn Slo l'lchanmed 53cri th AI I\" . Aged . Ma.lt]r , tlcc . aluto Ur r.ver . 7. l\"toham.ned Iqbal Ah r-rEr, S/o I'll]h3 rn,rE d 53dath Ala. Aqed . Ha .i ltrr r LL:. . f:lu t(] ljr r. ver . {Eoth Rlo H.N{1- 9-4-97 /J6. Er Lndavan Colony' foli t.lhor.rt: i , Hyderabad] Vasavi Nirfllaan (p, Ltd. ! Ftegd Uf tlce at Pt(1t NcJ- 59, !jtt eijt No- i, hosd No. i. s
Other Referred Cases
Vineet Narain vs. Union of India, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences vs. C Parameswara
Laws Referred To
Income Tax Act, 1961, Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Companies Act, 2013, Indian Penal Code
360 Brand Audit (30 mins)
₹299
1:1 Consultation on Business Development
₹1
Tax Holiday Secrets for Startups
₹0
Contractor Indemnity Agreement
₹0
Startup Valuation Certificate
₹0
SEBI Resets Mutual Fund Rules: A Structural Shift for Investors
Team Counselvise - March 13, 2026
Transfer Pricing and International Tax Reforms under Finance Bill, 2026: A Practical Overview
Team Counselvise - February 07, 2026
Finance Bill, 2026: Key GST Reforms that will Reshape Compliance and Cash Flows
Team Counselvise - February 03, 2026