SANT HARKEWAL SHIKSHAN SAMITI, AMBIKAPUR,SURGUJA V. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, AMBIKAPUR, AMBIKAPUR

ITA 570/RPR/2025

AI Insights

The case involves Sant Harkewal Shikshan Samiti, an educational institution, appealing against the order of the Income Tax Officer-1, Ambikapur, for the assessment year 2018-19. The initial appeal was dismissed by the CIT(Appeals)/NFAC due to non-prosecution, as the appellant failed to respond to multiple notices. However, the Tribunal referenced the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in CIT Vs. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF), which mandates that appellate authorities must address the merits of the case even if the appellant fails to appear or respond. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the case for a fresh decision on its merits.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 779603 (ITAT-RAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 16 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-10-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Appeal Filed On: 29-09-2025
• Other Referred Cases: CIT Vs. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF)
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: PRIYANKA PATEL
• Assessee Lawyers: G.S. AGRAWAL
• Keywords: Set aside; Principle of natural justice

Judgement Text

"आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण Ɋायपीठ “एक-सद˟” मामला रायपुर मŐ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR ŵी पाथŊ सारथी चौधरी, Ɋाियक सद˟ क े समƗ BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.570/RPR/2025 िनधाŊरण वषŊ /Assessment Year: 2018-19 Sant Harkewal Shikshan Samiti, Namna Kala, Surguja, Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh, 497001 PAN: AAIAS1529F .......अपीलाथŎ / Appellant बनाम / V/s. Income Tax Officer-1, Ambikapur, Income tax Office, 1, Kharsiya Marg, Near Ambika Petrol Pump, Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh, 497335 ……ŮȑथŎ / Respondent Assessee by : Mr. G.S. Agrawal, CA. Revenue by : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr.DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 14.10.2025 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 15.10.2025 Printed from counselvise.com 2 Sant Harkewal Shikshan Samiti, Ambikapur Vs. Income Tax Officer-1,Ambikapur ITA No. 570/RPR/2025 आदेश / ORDER PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM The captioned appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 02.07.2025 for the assessment year 2018-19 as per the grounds of appeal on record. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that an ex-parte order had been passed by the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC and the relevant paragraphs are extracted as follows: “4. Proceedings: Notice u/s 250 of the I.T. Act was issued to the appellant on 17/02/2025, 19.03.2025, 13.05.2025 & 23.05.2025 to furnish the details by 24/02/2025, 07/04/2025, 20/05/2025 & 30/05/2025 respectively. But no submission/response has been received. Sufficient opportunity has been provided to the appellant. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 5.1 By its own act, the appellant has failed to remain vigilant and did not avail the opportunity to submit its point of view/contention, as it did not respond to various notices issued. The fact that the appellant did receive the order filed the present appeal, but chose not to respond to any of the notices issued by this office clearly establish total disregard to the due process of law. Therefore, the conclusion Printed from counselvise.com 3 Sant Harkewal Shikshan Samiti, Ambikapur Vs. Income Tax Officer-1,Ambikapur ITA No. 570/RPR/2025 that the appellant could not controvert the findings given by the AO on merits of the issue either is inescapable. 5.2 In view of the above, I am of the considered view that no inference is called for to the impugned order passed u/s 147r.w.s.144B of the Act, and accordingly, the grounds of appeal of the appellant are “Dismissed”. 6. The appeal of the appellant, is accordingly dismissed.” 3. The appeal of the assessee has been dismissed in limine by the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC on the ground of non-prosecution. It is clear that sufficient opportunities were provided to the assessee, however, there was no compliance. At the same time, as mandated by the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of CIT Vs. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF) (2017) 297 CTR 614 (Bom)., the appellate authority must address the merits of each of the ground of appeal and cannot dismiss the appeal in limine for non-prosecution. A quasi judicial authority must record its finding on the basis of assessment order and the statement of facts and grounds of appeal, if no submission has been placed on record. But, it is not open to the CIT(A)/NFAC for dismissing the appeal of the assessee in limine for non-prosecution without addressing the merits of the case. The relevant extract of the referred judgement (supra) is as follows: \"8. From the aforesaid provisions, it is very clear once an appeal is preferred before the CIT(A), then in disposing of the appeal, he is obliged to make such further inquiry that he thinks fit or direct the AO to make further inquiry and report the result of the same to him Printed from counselvise.com 4 Sant Harkewal Shikshan Samiti, Ambikapur Vs. Income Tax Officer-1,Ambikapur ITA No. 570/RPR/2025 as found in Sec. 250 of the Act. Further, Sec. 250(6) of the Act obliges the CIT(A) to dispose of an appeal in writing after stating the points for determination and then render a decision on each of the points which arise for consideration with reasons in support. Sec. 251(1)(a) and (h) of the Act provide that while disposing of appeal the CIT(A) would have the power to confirm, reduce, enhance or annul an assessment and/or penalty. Besides Explanation to sub- s. (2) of s. 251 of the Act also makes it clear that while considering the appeal, the CIT(A) would be entitled to consider and decide any issue arising in the proceedings before him in appeal filed for its consideration, even if the issue is not raised by the appellant in its appeal before the CIT(A). Thus once an assessee files an appeal under s. 246A of the Act, it is not open to him as of right to withdraw or not press the appeal. In fact the CIT(A) is obliged to dispose of the appeal on merits. In fact w.e.f. 1st June, 2001 the power of the CIT(A) to set aside the order of the AO and restore it to the AO for passing a fresh order stands withdrawn. Therefore, it would be noticed that the powers of the CIT(A) are co-terminus with that of the AO i.e. he can do all that A.O could do. Therefore, just as it is not open to the AO to not complete the assessment by allowing the assessee to withdraw its return of income, it is not open to the assessee in appeal to withdraw and/or the CIT(A) to dismiss the appeal on account of non-prosecution of the appeal by the assessee. This is amply clear from the s. 251(1)(a) and (b) and Explanation to Sec. 251(2) of the Act which requires the CIT(A) to apply his mind to all the issues which arise from the impugned order before him whether or not the same has been raised by the appellant before him. Accordingly, the law does not empower the CIT(A) to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution as is evident from the provisions of the Act.” 4. Respectfully following the aforestated judicial pronouncement, the order of CIT(A)/NFAC is set aside and the matter is remanded back to its file for de novo adjudication on merits while complying with principles of natural justice. At the same time, the assessee is directed to represent its case on merits before the first appellate authority, since it is a final opportunity provided to the assessee. Printed from counselvise.com 5 Sant Harkewal Shikshan Samiti, Ambikapur Vs. Income Tax Officer-1,Ambikapur ITA No. 570/RPR/2025 5. As per the above terms, the grounds of appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes. 6. In result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in open court on 15th day of October, 2025. Sd/- (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) Ɋाियक सद˟/JUDICIAL MEMBER रायपुर / Raipur; िदनांक / Dated : 15th October, 2025. HKS, PS आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथŎ / The Appellant. 2. ŮȑथŎ / The Respondent. 3. The CIT(Appeals)-1, Raipur (C.G.) 4. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “एक-सद˟” बŐच, रायपुर / DR, ITAT, “SMC” Bench, Raipur. 5. गाडŊ फ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, //True copy// Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, रायपुर / ITAT, Raipur Printed from counselvise.com "