SELVARAJU,NAMAKKAL V. ITO, WARD-2, TIRUCHENGODE

ITA 353/CHNY/2025

AI Insights

This case involves an appeal by the assessee, Selvaraju, against the orders of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer for the Assessment Year 2011-12. Both the original assessment and the subsequent appeal were conducted ex parte due to the non-response of the assessee, attributed to notices going into the 'SPAM' folder of his email. The Tribunal noted the lack of proper opportunity given to the assessee to present his case and decided to set aside the impugned orders, restoring the matter to the AO for a fresh assessment. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to the principles of natural justice and provided specific directions for the conduct of the de novo assessment.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 396957 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 26-05-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Other Referred Cases: TIN Box Co. v. CIT [2001] 249 ITR 216 (SC)
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: KEERTHI NARAYANAN
• Assessee Lawyers: T.S.LAKSHMI
• Keywords: Set aside

Judgement Text

"आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘ए’ \u0001यायपीठ, चे ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI \u0001ी एबी टी. वक , ाियक सद\u0011 एवं एवं एवं एवं \u0001ी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद क े सम\u001b BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.353/Chny/2025 िनधा\u000eरण वष\u000e/Assessment Year: 2011-12 Selvaraju, 5/192, Salem Main Road, Ganapathy Nagar, Andagalur Gate Post, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal-637 401. v. The ITO, Ward-2, Tiruchengode. [PAN: AUEPS 8903 N] (अपीलाथ\u0016/Appellant) (\u0017\u0018यथ\u0016/Respondent) अपीलाथ\u0016 क\u001a ओर से/ Appellant by : Mr. T. S. Lakshmi Venkatraman, FCA \u0017\u0018यथ\u0016 क\u001a ओर से /Respondent by : Mr. Keerthi Narayanan, JCIT सुनवाईक\u001aतारीख/Date of Hearing : 24.04.2025 घोषणाक\u001aतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 26.05.2025 आदेश / O R D E R PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), Delhi, dated 06.12.2024 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as \"AY”) 2011-12. ITA No.353/Chny/2025 (AY 2011-12) Selvaraju :: 2 :: 2. At the outset, the Ld.AR of the assessee brought to our notice that impugned order of the Ld.CIT(A) as well as the assessment order passed by the AO are ex parte orders qua assessee. In this regard, it is noted that the Ld.CIT(A) has noted from the contents of the Form No.35 filed by the assessee that it was not accompanied with the complete set of assessment order and therefore, issued a defect notice on 08.11.2024 and finding no response, has dismissed it. Likewise, we find that the assessment order has been framed u/s.144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘ the Act‘) i.e. best judgment assessment, since the AO noted that the assessee didn’t respond to his notices, and was pleased to make the addition of Rs.34,69,000/- i.e. cash deposited in the assessee’s account. The assessee brought to our notice that four (4) notices issued by the AO has gone into the ‘SPAM’ account of the e-mail of the assessee. Therefore, assessee was not aware of the notices and therefore, couldn’t reply. Be that as it may, since the assessee didn’t get proper opportunity before the AO, relying on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of TIN Box Co. v. CIT reported in [2001] 249 ITR 216 (SC), we are inclined to set aside the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(A) and restore the assessment back to the file of the AO for de novo assessment. ITA No.353/Chny/2025 (AY 2011-12) Selvaraju :: 3 :: 3. The Ld.AR has undertaken to file the written submissions and other relevant documents before the AO. The AO is directed to send a copy of notice also to the Ld.AR’s e-mail ID: [e-mail]; and the AO to pass the order in accordance to law after hearing the assessee. Since there is negligence on the part of the assessee, cost of Rs.10,000/- is imposed which the assessee should remit to the State Legal Aid Authority, Hon’ble Madras High Court, and produce necessary proof of depositing of the same before the AO and thereafter, the AO to frame the de novo assessment after hearing the assessee in accordance to law. 4. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on the 26th day of May, 2025, in Chennai. Sd/- (एस. आर. रघुनाथा) (S.R.RAGHUNATHA) लेखा सद\u0003य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Sd/- (एबी टी. वक ) (ABY T. VARKEY) \u0005याियक सद\u0003य/JUDICIAL MEMBER चे ई/Chennai, !दनांक/Dated: 26th May, 2025. TLN आदेश क\u001a \u0017ितिलिप अ$ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ /Appellant 2. \u000e\u000fथ /Respondent 3. आयकरआयु\u0015/CIT, Chennai / Madurai / Salem / Coimbatore. 4. िवभागीय\u000eितिनिध/DR 5. गाड फाईल/GF "