SHAMRAJ MOORJANI V. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [INV] , HYD.

ITTA/115/2010

AI Insights

The case involves an appeal filed under section 260(4) of the Income-Tax Act against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad. The appeal was related to the assessment orders for the period 1988-89 to 1998-99. The appellant, Shamraj Moorjani, represented by counsel Pilli Nagaraj, decided not to pursue the appeal further following his death. The respondent was the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (INV), Circle 3[2], Hyderabad, represented by Ms. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, Junior Standing Counsel for Income Tax.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 752502 (HC-TELANGANA)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 03-02-2025
• Assessment Year: misc
• Laws Referred To: Income-Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Department Lawyers: BOKARO SAPNA REDDY
• Assessee Lawyers: PILLI NAGARAJ
• Keywords: Appeal dismissed; Income Tax; Not pressed
• Section: 151 CPC; 260-4

Judgement Text

"IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERAEAD MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 134471 PRESENT , THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 11 5 0F 2010 Appeal fired under section 260(4) of the rncome-Tax Act, against the order daled. 27-02-2009 passed in rr(ss).No. 13/Hydr20o7 Brock period .1988-89 to 1998-99 on the fire of the court of the rncome Tax Appeflate Tribunar Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad preferred against the order dated: 11-12-2006 passed in rrA No.0204/05-06 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals), Ayakar Bhavan, Near Kambala Tank, Rajahmundry Camp at O/o. the CIT (Appeats)_lv, Hyderabad preferred against the Assessment order dated: 2g-10-1g9g passed in PAN/GIR No. 5-774 on the file of the Income Tax Department, Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax(lnv), Circle 3(2), Hyderabad. Between: Shamraj Moorjani, S/o Bojraj Moorjani, Occ: Business R/o plot No.34, Opp. Hitech School, Swarnadama nagar, NDF Road, Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad. ,..APPELLANT/APPELLANT AND The Deputy Commissioner Of lncome Tax(lNV), Circle _ 3 [2] , Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT v ITTAMP. NO: 48 OF 20'10 petition under Section 151 CPC p rryii! tf,\"t in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court ma)/ be pleased suspend the operation of the summons, Ref.No.TRO-7/SR llo.24lHydlo4- 05/2009, dated 1410,2009 rssued by the Tax Recovery officer, Range-7' Hyderabad by staying all further proceedings in lT [sS].No '13/Hyd/2007 on the file of lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B'' Counsel for the Apprellant: SRI PILLI NAGARAJ Counsel for the Respondent: Ms. BOKARO SAPNA REDDY, JUNIOR S,C. FOR I.T, The Court made the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA INCOME TA)( TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.115 of2OlO JUDGMENT: @er the Hon'ble si Justte p. Srlm Kostw) Heard Mr. Pilli Nagaraj, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, learned Junior Standing Counsei for Income Tax appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has since expired, he does not intend to pursue the appeal any further. In view of the same, the appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. No costs. 3. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stald closed. Sd/- M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII s CTION OFFICER To, '1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench ,B', Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals), Ayakar Bhavan, Near Kambala - Ignk Rajahmundry Or Camp at O/o. the CtT (Appeats)-tV, Hy{erabad 3. The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax(lnv), lncome Tax Delartment, Circle 3(2), Hyderabad. 4. One CC to Sri Pilli Nagaraj, Advocate tOpUCl 5. One CC to [Vls. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, Advocate [OpUC] 6. Two CD Copies Plp/gh A l / HIGH COURT DATED:0310212025 JUDGMENT lTTA.No.115 of 2010 DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS NOT PRESSED. ? I iirii 2$25 a 7/ * Fa yr4r 119(i a) ,..:2 6 Irr t: {tl ,qre: .-,.) I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I c "