Shatrughan Mahanand and Imran Mohd. and Dashrath Lal Shrivas and Kumar Maheshwari and B. Prakash alias B. Peeter Paul Raju and Smt Premwati V. Union of India and Central Board of Direct Taxes and Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCA) and Chief Commissioner of Income Tax and Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Range II

WPS/3027/2014

AI Insights

The case involves a group of petitioners who were appointed as casual employees and sought regularization of their employment. The petitioners argued for consideration of their past work experience and relaxation of age criteria if regular vacancies were to be filled. The respondents included various authorities from the Union of India and the Income Tax Department. The High Court of Chhattisgarh, presided over by Hon'ble Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Justice I.S. Uboweja, heard the arguments and referenced the Constitution Bench decision in Secretary State of Karnataka & others vs. Uma Devi (2006) 4 SCC 1, which addresses the issue of regularization of services.

• Counselvise Citation: [2014] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 802457 (HC-CHHATTISGARH)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 21-08-2014
• Assessment Year: misc
• Other Referred Cases: Secretary State of Karnataka & others vs. Uma Devi (3) and others, (2006) 4 SCC 1
• Laws Referred To: Article 226 of the Constitution of India
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Department Lawyers: ANAND DADARIYA
• Assessee Lawyers: A V SHRIDHAR
• Keywords: Regularisation; Writ petition; Casual Employees; Weightage; Relaxation of Age
• Section: 226

Judgement Text

"^ ^,f &^f THE HIGH COURT_QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPIS)_5°_a9rN02014 rt;..;«;; ^^ SV!,' PETITIONER vc^w<