SHREE BILESHWARI MAHADEV,MEHSANA V. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

ITA 2046/AHD/2024

AI Insights

The case involves Shree Bileshwari Mahadev, a Trust, appealing against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), which denied their registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The denial was initially due to a mismatch in the Trust's name in the PAN database and other official documents. The Trust rectified the name discrepancy post the CIT(E)'s decision and requested the matter be set aside for re-evaluation. The Tribunal found the delay in filing the appeal justified and set aside the matter, imposing a cost on the Trust to ensure compliance and promptness in future proceedings.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 312822 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 30-04-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Assessment Year: misc
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: GIVING ONE MORE

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH Before: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar, Judicial Member And Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar, Accountant Member Shree Bileshwari Mahadev Ranchodbhai Mohanlal Patel, Nava Dhar Bholidas Madh, Visnagar, Mehsana-384320, Gujarat PAN: AAPTS5385K (Appellant) Vs The CIT(Exemption), Ahmedabad (Respondent) Assessee Represented: Shri Dhrunal Bhatt, A.R. Revenue Represented: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DR Date of hearing : 29-04-2025 Date of pronouncement : 30-04-2025 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the order dated 28.09.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax [Exemption] denying registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). ITA No. 2046/Ahd/2024 I.T.A No. 2046/Ahd/2024 Page No Shree Bileshwari Mahadev Vs. CIT(E) 2 2. The registry has noted that there is a delay of 127 days in filing the above appeal. By way of Notarized Affidavit, it is stated that the assessee is a small Trust and is not familiar with the looking of emails and online filing. Thus the rejection order passed by Ld. CIT(E) was not verified, which is an inadvertent oversight mistake. When the same was realized the Trust has reached out to an outstation Tax Consultant, who advised to file appeal before the Tribunal, which has caused the delay of 127 days, which is neither intentional and the same be condoned. We are satisfied with the above reasons and hereby condone the delay of 127 days in filing the above appeal. 3. The Ld. CIT(E) given three opportunities of hearing on 30-09- 2023, 04-04-2024 and 06-05-2024. The assessee Trust partially complied with the details and also found the name of the Trust has registered with the Dy. Charity Commissioner, Mehsana as “Shri Bileshwar Mahadev, Umta”. However in the PAN database and Form No. 10AB, the name of the Trust is claimed as “Shri Bileshwari Mahadev”. Since there is mismatch in the name of the Trust, Ld. CIT(E) denied the registration. 4. The Ld. Counsel submitted that the mismatch in the PAN database is now rectified and the name of the Trust is “Shri Bileshwari Mahadav” only and produced a copy of the PAN card and requested to setaside the matter back to the file of Ld. CIT(E). 5. We have perused the materials available on record. In all the proceedings, the assessee Trust claimed its name as ‘Bileshwari” instead of Bileshwar. Whereas the Trust Deed was registered as I.T.A No. 2046/Ahd/2024 Page No Shree Bileshwari Mahadev Vs. CIT(E) 3 “Shri Bileshwar Mahadev” only. This being the genuine mistake now rectified after passing of the order by Ld. CIT(E). However, in the interest of justice, we deem it fit to setaside the matter by imposing a cost of Rs.5,000/- to be payable to the Income Tax Department within two weeks of receipt of this order. On production of the receipt for payment of the cost, the Ld. CIT(E) is directed to issue fresh notice to the assessee by giving one more opportunity of hearing to the assessee and pass order in accordance with law. 6. In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open court on 30-04-2025 Sd/- Sd/- (MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR) (T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad : Dated 30/04/2025 आदेश कȧ ĤǓतͧलͪप अĒेͪषत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. Assessee 2. Revenue 3. Concerned CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. Guard file. By order/आदेश से, उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, अहमदाबाद "