SMT. MANJIT KAUR,MOHALI V. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

ITA 246/CHANDI/2023

AI Insights

The case involves Smt. Manjit Kaur, who appealed against the order of the CIT(A) concerning the assessment of her agricultural income for several years. Following a search and seizure operation at M/s Bajwa Group, notices were issued under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, to which the assessee responded by declaring her agricultural income. The AO, however, reclassified this income as 'income from other sources' due to the absence of a J-Form, despite the absence of incriminating material. The Tribunal, referencing a Supreme Court decision, ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the credibility of state revenue documents and the lack of incriminating evidence to support the reclassification of the income.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 298526 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 22-04-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Other Referred Cases: Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. 454 ITR 212
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: KUSUM BA NSAL
• Assessee Lawyers: SUDHIR SEHGAL
• Section: 143(2); 64; 132; 153A; 139(1)

Judgement Text

"आयकर अपील य अ धकरण,च\u0010डीगढ़ \u0014यायपीठ, च\u0010डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, ‘B’ CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos. 245 to 249/CHD/2023 नधा\u0011रण वष\u0011 / A.Y.: 2013-14 to 2015-16 & 2017-18, 2018-19 Smt. Manjit Kaur, House No. 1126, Phase-9, Mohali (Punjab). Vs The DCIT, Central Circle-1, Chandigarh. \u0016थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AJYPK7280M अपीलाथ\u001a/Appellant \u001b यथ\u001a/Respondent Assessee by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate Revenue by : Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 27.03.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 22.04.2025 HYBRID HEARING O R D E R PER RAJPAL YADAV, VP The present five appeals are directed at the instance of the assessee against the common order of ld. CIT(A) dated 28.02.2023 passed for assessment years 2013-14 to 2015-16 and 2017-18, 2018-19 respectively. 2. The facts on vital points are common, therefore, for the facility of reference, we take facts from ITA 245/CHD/2019 for assessment year 2013-14. ITA No.245 to 249/CHD/2023 A.Y.2013-14 to 2015-16 & 2017-18, 2018-19 2 3. A search & seizure operation was carried out at M/s Bajwa Group of cases on 13.02.2019. The case of the assessee was also covered under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act. The AO, thereafter issued notices under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act on 15.01.2020. In response to these notices, assessee has filed her return of income declaring same income which was filed by her under Section 139(1) of the Act. We deem it pertinent to take note of these details. It emerges out that assessee has filed return of income on 30.03.2014, 31.03.2015, 31.03.2016, 30.03.2018 and 31.03.2019 declaring total income at Rs. 10,30,570/-, 8,67,990/-, 8,94,260/-, 9,34,040/- and 9,11,120/- in assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2017-18 and 2018-19 respectively. The Department was unable to lay its hand on any incriminating material, however it has made addition of agriculture income declared by the assessee. A perusal of the record would indicate that assessee has declared agriculture income at Rs.4 lacs in assessment year 2013-14 to 2015-16 and in 2017-18 such income was declared at Rs.60,000/-. Similarly, in assessment year ITA No.245 to 249/CHD/2023 A.Y.2013-14 to 2015-16 & 2017-18, 2018-19 3 2018-19 it was declared as Rs.60,000/-. The AO did not allow treatment to this agriculture income and assessed it as 'income from other sources'. The only reason assigned by him is that assessee did not file J-Form. 4. Appeal to the ld. CIT(A) did not bring any relief to the assessee. 5. With the assistance of ld. Representative, we have gone through the record carefully. It is pertinent to note that no incriminating material was found during the course of search. The search was carried out on 13.02.2019. The time limit to issue notice under Section 143(2) for scrutinizing the returns of the assessee was over in assessment year 2013-14 to 2015-16 and 2017-18. Therefore, no action could be taken by the Revenue in these assessment years unless any incriminating material was found. To this extent, issue in dispute is squarely covered by the latest decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. 454 ITR 212. ITA No.245 to 249/CHD/2023 A.Y.2013-14 to 2015-16 & 2017-18, 2018-19 4 6. As far as assessment year 2018-19 is concerned, assessee has declared agriculture income of Rs.65,000/-. She was possessing 64 kanal 15 marla of agriculture land. Even if the AO has taken an estimated opinion, then also he should not have disbelieved the version of the assessee. The assessee has produced copies of ‘Jamabandi’ alongwith ‘Khasra Girdawari’ and these documents were prepared by the State Revenue officials of Punjab during their ordinary course of duty. These documents are otherwise per-se admissible in evidence because a presumption of truth is attached with them. The simple reason for this is that these documents are contemplated under the Punjab Land Revenue Act and they are being maintained by the Revenue officials of the Punjab Government. Therefore, on the strength of this Revenue record, an estimated view of agriculture income ought to have been taken before giving credit of agriculture income at Rs.65,000/-. The treatment given by the AO is not sustainable in the eyes of law. Accordingly, we delete the addition in all these five years and direct the AO to treat ITA No.245 to 249/CHD/2023 A.Y.2013-14 to 2015-16 & 2017-18, 2018-19 5 alleged agriculture income declared by the assessee as agriculture income only. 7. In the result, all the five appeals of the assessee are allowed. Order pronounced on 22.04.2025. Sd/- Sd/- (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (RAJPAL YADAV) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT “Poonam” आदेश क\u0002 \u0003ितिलिप अ ेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ\u000f/ The Appellant 2. \u0003\u0010यथ\u000f/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु\u0014/ CIT 4. िवभागीय \u0003ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय आिधकरण, च\u0018डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 5. गाड फाईल/ Guard File आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar "