SU PRABHAT CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MUMBAI

ITA 1930/MUM/2025

AI Insights

The case involves Suprabhat Co-operative Housing Society appealing against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax, which upheld the disallowance of a deduction claimed under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The deduction pertained to interest income from investments with Cooperative Banks. The Tribunal examined whether the Assessee was entitled to the deduction despite the initial disallowance by the Assessing Officer, which was based on the timing of the return filing and the interpretation of section 80P(2)(d) in conjunction with section 80P(4). The Tribunal referenced several precedents and legal provisions, ultimately deciding in favor of the Assessee.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 396574 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 26-05-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2020-2021
• Other Referred Cases: PCIT - III Bengaluru Vs. Vipro Limited, Pathare Prabhu Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. ITO, Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs CIT, Calicut, Kaliandas Udyog Bhavan Premises Coop Society Ltd vs ITO, Pr.CIT v/s Totagars Co-operative Sales Society
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SMITHA V. NAIR
• Assessee Lawyers: RAJENDRA BHENDE; FILING
• Keywords: Set aside; Revised return
• Section: 139(5)

Judgement Text

"1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1930/MUM/2025 Assessment Year: 2020-21 Suprabhat Co-operative Housing Society 76, Suprabhat Co-operative Housing Society Ltd, Bhulabhai Desai Road, Walkeshwar 400026 PAN: AAAAS5937P Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 19(3)(1), Mumbai Pratishtha Bhavan, 3rd & 4th Floor, 101, M.K. Road, Mumbai 400020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : Shri. Rajendra Bhende, CA Revenue by : Smt. Smitha V. Nair (CIT DR) Date of Hearing : 15.05.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 26.05.2025 O R D E R Per: Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member: This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 26.12.2024, impugned herein, passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal ADDL./JCIT (A)-1 Bengaluru/ u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2020-21. 2. Considering the reason for delay of 21 days in filing of the instant appeal as stated by the Assessee which is duly supported by duly sworn affidavit, prima facie appears to be bonafide, genuine and un-intentional, thus, the delay of 21 days is condoned. 3. Coming to merits of the case, this Court that he Assessee has filed revised return of income u/s. 139(5) of the Act on dated 22.02.2025 within the time prescribed and claimed the deduction u/s. 80P(2d) of the Act to 2 ITA No. 1930/Mum/2025 AY: 202-21 Suprabhat Co-operative Housing Society the tune of Rs. 23,31,548/- which has been disallowed by the Ld. CPC/AO vide intimation/order u/s. 143(1) of the Act, dated 26.12.2021. 4. Therefore, the Assessee being aggrieved filed 1st appeal before the Ld. Commissioner, challenging the said disallowance however, could not get any relief, as Ld. Commissioner declined to entertain the claim of the Assessee mainly of the reason that the Assessee has not filed its return of income within the due date i.e.15.02.2021 as extended and therefore, CPC has rightly disallowed deduction claimed by the Assessee. 5. The Ld. Commissioner while declining the claim of the Assessee and upholding the order of CPC, has also taken refuge of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of PCIT - III Bengaluru Vs. Vipro Limited (Civil Appeal No. 1449/2022) [arising out of SLP (Civil No.7620/2021)] order dated 11.07.2022. 6. We observe that the Hon’ble Apex Court in the said case, affirmed the disallowance made by the AO on account of not allowing the exemption claimed u/s. 10B(8), basically for non- furnishing of declaration qua such claim before the due date of filing of original return of income u/s. 139(1) of the Act and before the AO. 7. However, admittedly, in the instant case, the Assessee by filing original return of income on dated 15.02.2021, has also duly claimed the deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Somehow, the Assessee revised his return of income for claiming other income/disallowance in addition to deduction u/s. 80P(2d) of the Act and therefore the disallowance made by the AO/CPC is un-sustainable as the Assessee is entitled to get such claim lodged u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act, in view of various judgments including by the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal at Mumbai in the case of Pathare Prabhu Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. ITO (ITA No.1346 & 1347/M/2023 decided on 27.07.2023) (2023) 153 taxmann.com 714 3 ITA No. 1930/Mum/2025 AY: 202-21 Suprabhat Co-operative Housing Society (Mum. – Trib.), wherein the Hon’ble Bench by considering the relevant provisions of the law and judgments concerning the issue, ultimately allowed identical deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act, by observing and holding as under: “8. We have considered the submissions of both sides and perused the material available on record. The only dispute raised by the Assessee is against the disallowance of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest income received from the Co-operative Banks. The Assessee is a registered Co-operative Housing Society and during the assessment year 2018-19 earned interest income of Rs. 50,39,861 from the investments made in various Co-operative Banks. 9. Before proceeding further, it is relevant to note the provisions of section 80P of the Act under which the Assessee has claimed the deduction in the present case. As per the provisions of section 80P(1) of the Act, the income referred to in sub-section (2) to section 80P shall be allowed as a deduction to an Assessee being a Co-operative Society. Further, section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, reads as under: “80P. Deduction in respect of income of co-operative societies. (1) ...... (2) The sums referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely:– (a) ..... (b) ..... (c) ..... (d) in respect of any income by way of interest or dividends derived by the cooperative society from its investments with any other co- operative society, the whole of such income;” 10. Thus, for the purpose of provisions of section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, two conditions are required to be cumulatively satisfied- (i) income by way of interest or dividend is earned by the Co-operative Society from the investments, and (ii) such investments should be with any other Co- operative Society. Further, the term „co-operative society‟ is defined under section 2(19) of the Act as under: “(19) \"co-operative society\" means a co-operative society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 (2 of 1912), or under any other law for the time being in force in any State for the registration of co-operative societies; 11. In the present case, there is no dispute that the Assessee is a Co Operative Housing Society. Thus, if any income as referred to in sub- section (2) to section 80P of the Act is included in the gross total income of the Assessee, the same shall be allowed as a deduction. It is pertinent 4 ITA No. 1930/Mum/2025 AY: 202-21 Suprabhat Co-operative Housing Society to note that since the Assessee is registered under the Maharashtra Co- operative Societies Act, 1960, it is required to invest or deposit its funds in one of the modes provided in section 70 of the aforesaid Act, which includes investment or deposit of funds in the District Central Co- operative Bank or the State Cooperative Bank. Accordingly, the Assessee kept the deposits in Co-operative Banks registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act and earned interest, which was claimed as a deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The AO denied the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act on the basis that the Co- operative Bank is covered under the provisions of section 80P(4) of the Act. We find that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs CIT, Calicut, [2021] 431 ITR 1 (SC) while analyzing the provisions of section 80P(4) of the Act held that section 80P(4) is a proviso to the main provision contained in section 80P(1) and (2) and excludes only Cooperative Banks, which are Co-operative Societies and also possesses a licence from RBI to do banking business. The Hon’ble Supreme Court further held that the limited object of section 80P(4) is to exclude Co-operative Banks that function at par with other commercial banks i.e. which lend money to members of the public. Thus, we are of the considered view that section 80P(4) of the Act is of relevance only in a case where the Assessee, who is a Co-operative Bank, claims a deduction under section 80P of the Act which is not the facts of the present case. Therefore, we find no merits in the aforesaid reasoning adopted by the AO and upheld by the learned CIT(A) in denying deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act to the Assessee. 12. As regards the claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it is also pertinent to note that all Co-operative Banks are Co-operative Societies but vice versa is not true. We find that the coordinate benches of the Tribunal have consistently taken a view in favour of the Assessee and held that even the interest earned from the Co-operative Banks is allowable as a deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. In Kaliandas Udyog Bhavan Premises Coop Society Ltd vs ITO, in ITA No. 6547/ Mum./2017, vide order dated 25/04/2018, while dealing with the provisions of section 80P(2)(d) vis-à-vis section 80P(4) of the Act, the coordinate bench of the Tribunal observed as under: “7. ……Thus, from a perusal of the aforesaid Sec. 80P(2)(d) it can safely be gathered that income by way of interest income derived by an Assessee cooperative society from its investments held with any other cooperative society, shall be deducted in computing the total income of the Assessee. We may herein observe, that what is relevant for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) is that the interest income should have been derived from the investments made by the Assessee co-operative society with any other cooperative society. We though are in agreement with the observations of the lower authorities that with the insertion of Sub- section (4) of Sec. 80P, vide the Finance Act, 2006, with effect from 01.04.2007, the provisions of Sec. 80P would no more be applicable in relation to any co-operative bank, other than a 5 ITA No. 1930/Mum/2025 AY: 202-21 Suprabhat Co-operative Housing Society primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank, but however, are unable to subscribe to their view that the same shall also jeopardize the claim of deduction of a cooperative society under Sec. 80P(2)(d) in respect of the interest income on their investments parked with a co-operative bank. We have given a thoughtful consideration to the issue before us and are of the considered view that as long as it is proved that the interest income is being derived by a cooperative society from its investments made with any other cooperative society, the claim of deduction under the aforesaid statutory provision, viz. Sec. 80P(2)(d) would be duly available. We may herein observe that the term 'co-operative society' had been defined under Sec. 2(19) of the Act, as under: '(19) \"Co-operative society\" means a cooperative society registered under the Cooperative Societies Act, 1912 (2 of 1912), or under any other law for the time being in force in any state for the registration of co-operative societies;' We are of the considered view, that though the co-operative bank pursuant to the insertion of Sub-section (4) of Sec. 80P would no more be entitled for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P of the Act, but however, as a co-operative bank continues to be a co-operative society registered under the Cooperative Societies Act, 1912 (2 of 1912), or under any other law for the time being enforced in any state for the registration of co-operative societies, therefore, the interest income derived by a co-operative society from its investments held with a co-operative bank, would be entitled for claim of deduction under Sec.80P(2)(d) of the Act.” 13. We find that the learned CIT(A) has placed reliance upon the decision of the Hon‟ble Karnataka High Court in Pr.CIT v/s Totagars Co-operative Sales Society, [2017] 395 ITR 611 (Karn.), wherein it was held that interest earned by the Assessee, a Co-operative Society, from surplus deposits kept with a Cooperative Bank, was not eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. We find that in an earlier decision the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in Pr.CIT v/s Totagars Co-operative Sales Society, [2017] 392 ITR 74 (Karn.) held that according to section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, the amount of interest earned from a Co-operative Society Bank would be deductible from the gross income of the Co-operative Society in order to assess its total income. Thus, there are divergent views of the same Hon’ble High Court on the issue of eligibility of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest earned from Co-operative Bank. No decision of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court was brought to our notice on this aspect. We have to, with our highest respect to both the views of the Hon'ble High Court, adopt an objective criterion for deciding as to which decision of the Hon'ble High Court should be followed by us. We find guidance from the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd., [1972] 88 ITR 192. In the aforesaid decision, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down a 6 ITA No. 1930/Mum/2025 AY: 202-21 Suprabhat Co-operative Housing Society principle that \"if two reasonable constructions of a taxing provisions are possible, that construction which favours the Assessee must be adopted\". 14. Therefore, in view of the above, we uphold the plea of the Assessee and direct the AO to grant the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act to the Assessee in respect of interest income earned from investment with Cooperative Banks. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order passed by the learned CIT(A) for the assessment year 2018-19. As a result, grounds raised by the Assessee are allowed.” 8. As the issue involved qua deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act is squarely covered in favour of the Assessee, in view of aforesaid judgment and thus the claim lodged by the Assessee u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act is allowed. 9. Consequently, the appeal of the Assessee stands allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 26.05.2025. Sd/- (NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY) JUDICIAL MEMBER * Divya R. Nandgaonkar, Stenographer Copy to: The Appellant The Respondent The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai The DR Concerned Bench //True Copy// By Order Dy./Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai. "