" 1 ITA No. 280/Del/2025 Suman Verma Vs. ITO IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI [ DELHI BENCH : “B” NEW DELHI] BEFORE SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 280/DEL/2025 (A.Y 2016-17) SumanVerma Hosue No. 298/1/D-1 GhitorniVillae Delhi-1100009 PAN: ADQPV1311C Vs Income Tax Officer Ward-36(1) E-2, Block, Pratyaksh Kar Bhawan, Civic Centre, Delhi Appellant Respondent Assessee by Sh. V. Rajkumar, Adv Revenue by Sh. Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 21/07/2025 Date of Pronouncement 21/07/2025 ORDER PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM: The present appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ National Faceless Appeal Centre (‘Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC’ for short), New Delhi dated 12/11/2024 for the Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. An assessment order came to be passed on 23/05/2023 u/s 147 r.w. Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) by making certain addition u/s 69A r.w. Section 115BBEE of the Act. The Assessee preferred an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) which has been dismissed on 12/11/2024 vide order impugned. As against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 12/11/2024, the Assessee preferred the present Appeal. Printed from counselvise.com 2 ITA No. 280/Del/2025 Suman Verma Vs. ITO 3. The Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that both the order of the A.O. as well as Ld. CIT(A) are ex-parte and the Ld. CIT(A) has not decided on the grounds of the Appeal of the Assessee and the order impugned came to be passed in violation of principals of natural justice. Thus, sought for allowing the Appeal. 4. Per contra, the Ld. Department's Representative submitted that the Assessee is a chronic defaulter who has not appeared before the Lower Authorities, therefore, both the A.O. as well as the Ld. CIT(A) have passed the respective orders in accordance with law which requires no interference, thus by relying on the orders of the Lower Authorities sought for dismissal of the Appeal. 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. Both the order of the A.O. as well as order of the Ld. CIT(A) are ex-parte, wherein the Assessee has not participated in any of the proceedings. Even the Ld. CIT(A) has not decided all the grounds of Appeal on its merits. In view of the above, in the interest of justice, we deem it fit to restore the issue to the file of the A.O. for de- novo assessment. Needless to say, the A.O. shall provide opportunity of being heard to the Assessee before passing the assessment order in accordance with law. The Assessee is also directed to participate in assessment proceedings without fail. Printed from counselvise.com 3 ITA No. 280/Del/2025 Suman Verma Vs. ITO 6. In the result, the Appeal of the Appellant is partly allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open court on 21st July, 2025 Sd/- Sd/- (MANISH AGARWAL) (YOGESH KUMAR U.S.) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Date:- 21 .07.2025 R.N, Sr.P.S* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTR ITAT, NEW DELHI Printed from counselvise.com "
