SUSHILA DEVI UMRAVSINGH PATEL SEVA SANSTHAN,BARWANI V. CIT EXEMPTION , BHOPAL

ITA 253/IND/2024

AI Insights

The case involves Sushila Devi Umravsingh Patel Seva Sansthan, a society that applied for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, which was initially granted provisionally. The CIT Exemption later rejected the application for regular registration, citing the society's failure to apply for regular approval under section 80G(5) within the stipulated six-month period from the start of its activities. The society contested this decision, arguing that it had applied within an extended deadline provided by a CBDT circular issued after the CIT's decision. The Tribunal found merit in the society's argument and remanded the case for reconsideration.

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 35853 (ITAT-INDORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 6 month(s) 12 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 09-10-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2024
• Assessment Year: 2024-2025
• Appeal Filed On: 27-03-2024
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RAM KUMAR
• Assessee Lawyers: ASHISH GOYAL
• Keywords: Set aside; Principle of natural justice

Judgement Text

"आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, इंदौर Ûयायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.253/Ind/2024 Sushila Devi Umravsingh Patel Seva Sansthan, 13 Old Housing Board Colony, Barwani S.O, Barwani Vs. CIT Exemption, Bhopal (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) PAN: ABUAS7259P Assessee by Shri Ashish Goyal, AR Revenue by Shri Ram Kumar, CIT-DR Date of Hearing 07.10.2024 Date of Pronouncement 09.10.2024 O R D E R Per Vijay Pal Rao, JM: This appeal by the assesse is directed against the order dated 18.03.2024 of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemptions, Bhopal whereby the application of the assessee for registration u/s 12AB of the Act was rejected. 2. Assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: ITA No.253/Ind/2024 Sushila Devi Umravsingh Patel Seva Sansthan 2 “1. The order appealed against is bad-in-law, void- ab-initio, barred by limitation, against the principles of natural justice and fair play, illegal and therefore liable to be quashed. 2. Without prejudice, the Ld. CIT Exemption, Bhopal erred in rejecting the application filed for registration u/s 12AB without considering the documents on records and facts and circumstances of the case. 3. Without prejudice, the registration u/s 12AB ought to be granted in the facts and circumstances of the case. 4. The appellant carves leave to add, amend or modify any of the grounds of appeal.” 3. Before the Tribunal the Ld. AR of the assessee has submitted that the assessee society was granted provisional registration u/s 12AB of the Act on 21.11.2022. Thereafter the CIT Exemption has rejected the regular registration u/s 12AB of the Act on the ground that the assessee was also granted provisional approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act on 01.12.2022 but the assessee did not apply for regular approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act within the period of 6 months from the start of the activities as stipulated in Clause (iii) of first proviso to Section 80G(5) of the Act. The Ld. AR has further submitted that the CIT Exemption has observed that the assessee society started activities in the financial year 2022-23 and received CSR donation of Rs.25 lakh without valid registration certificate u/s 80G(5) of the ITA No.253/Ind/2024 Sushila Devi Umravsingh Patel Seva Sansthan 3 Act. Therefore, the application for regular registration u/s 12AB of the Act was rejected by the CIT Exemption only on the ground that the assessee did not apply for regular approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act within the stipulated period of 6 months. He has pointed out that the period of 6 months was extended by CBDT vide Circular No.7/2024 dated 25.04.2024 till 30th June, 2024 and accordingly assessee applied for regular approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act vide application dated 30.06.2024. Thus, the Ld. AR has submitted that when the assessee has applied for regular approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act within the period as extended by the CBDT then the CSR donation received by the assessee was during the valid registration (provisional) u/s 80G(5) of the Act. Hence, he has pleaded that the impugned order of CIT Exemption is not sustainable and liable to be set aside. 4. On the other hand Ld. Departmental Representative has submitted that the time limit for filing the application u/s 80G(5) of the Act was extended by the CBDT vide Circular No.7/2024 dated 25.04.202 which was subsequent to the impugned order passed by the CIT Exemption and therefore, the said circular was not ITA No.253/Ind/2024 Sushila Devi Umravsingh Patel Seva Sansthan 4 available with CIT Exemption at the time of passing the impugned order. 5. We have considered the rival submissions as well as relevant material on record. The CIT Exemption issued show cause notice to assessee and relevant extract are reproduced in para 2 of the impugned order as under: “2. Subsequently, notice was issued to the assessee on 01.03.2024 to furnish the following explanations:- \"On perusal of Form 10AC provisional registration u/s 80G(5) submitted by the assessee it is observed that it was granted to the assessee on 01.12.2022 and the assessee was required to apply in Form 10AB under Clause (iii) of First Proviso to Section 80G(5) of the Act, within six months from the start of activities. In the present case, the activities of the assessee was started in FY 2022-23 but the assessee has not applied for regular registration U/s 80G(5) of the Act and provisional registration u/s 80G(5) dated 01.12.2022 is already expired and valid. The society has started the activities in the F.Y 2022-2023 and received the CSR donation Rs. 25,00,000/- and doing CSR activities without valid registration certificate U/s 80G(5) of the Act. Valid Registration U/s 12AB and 80G(5) is compulsory for doing CSR activities as per CSR Rules MCA Notification dated 22.01.2021. Please explain the same.\" 5.1 Thus, the main reason for rejecting the application was recorded by the CIT Exemption that the assessee after getting the provisional approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act did not applied for regular approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act within the stipulated period of 6 months from the start of activities as provided in Clause (iii) of ITA No.253/Ind/2024 Sushila Devi Umravsingh Patel Seva Sansthan 5 proviso to Section 80G(5) of the Act. After issuing the above notice seeking the explanation of the assessee, the CIT Exemption has rejected the application and also cancelled the provisional approval in para 5 as under: “5. In view of the above facts, the application of the assessee in Form 10AB for grant of registration u/s 12AB of the Act is hereby rejected and the provisional registration/approval u/s 12AB in Form 10AC vide URN No. ABUAS7259PE20221 dated 30.11.2022 granted by CPC is also hereby cancelled as per the provisions of section 12AB (1)(b)(ii)(B) of the Act.” 5.2 It is pertinent to note that the CBDT vide Circular No.7/2024 dated 25.04.2024 extended the time limit for making the application till 30th June, 2024 and consequently the assessee has applied for regular approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act vide application dated 30.06.2024 placed at Page-3 of the synopsis. Thus, it is clear that after extension of time limit for making the application and consequent application filed by the assessee are the subsequent developments to the impugned order passed by the CIT Exemption. Accordingly, in the facts and circumstances of the case the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the record of CIT Exemption for reconsideration of the application of the assessee for registration u/s 12AB of the Act in the light of the ITA No.253/Ind/2024 Sushila Devi Umravsingh Patel Seva Sansthan 6 CBDT circular No.7/2024 dated 25.04.2024 as well as the application filed by the assessee for regular approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act. Needless to say that the assessee be given an appropriate opportunity of hearing before passing the order. 6. In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open court on 09.10.2024. Sd/- Sd/- (B.M. BIYANI) (VIJAY PAL RAO) Accountant Member Judicial Member Indore,_09.10.2024 Dev/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPY Sr. Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore "