TANAJI KEDARI SAPKAL,KOLHAPUR V. ITO WARD (1), KOLHAPUR

ITA 2478/PUN/2024

AI Insights

The case involves Tanaji Kedari Sapkal, a retired employee of BSNL, who appealed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) which confirmed the denial of exemption on Leave Encashment received upon his retirement. The exemption claimed under section 10(10AA) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was initially partially allowed, limiting the exempt amount to Rs.3,00,000 and adding the remaining Rs.7,87,092 to taxable income. The Tribunal examined the bifurcation of the Leave Encashment received from the Department of Telecommunications and BSNL separately, and based on the provisions applicable to government and non-government employees, granted full exemption for both amounts.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 24800 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 07-01-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Laws Referred To: Income-tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: VINOD PAWAR
• Keywords: Rectification of order

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCHES “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE DR.MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.2478/PUN/2024 Assessment Year : 2018-19 Tanaji Kedari Sapkal, Plot No.9, Postal Colony, At Post Pachgaon, Taluka Karveer, Kolhapur – 416013 Maharashtra PAN : BNBPS0498H Vs The ITO, Ward-1(1), Kolhapur Appellant Respondent आदेश / ORDER PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : This appeal by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year 2018-19 is directed against the order dated 23.10.2024 passed by National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) which inturn is arising out of the Rectification Order passed u/s.154 dated 29.10.2021. Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Vinod Pawar Date of hearing : 24.12.2024 Date of pronouncement : 07.01.2025 ITA No.2478/PUN/2024 Tanaji Kedari Sapkal 2 2. The grievance of the assessee is that ld.NFAC has confirmed the action of the CPC denying exemption u/s.10(10AA) of the Act at Rs.7,87,092/-received towards Leave Encashment on his retirement. 3. Facts in brief are that the assessee is an individual who was the employee of the BSNL (a public Sector Undertaking) retired on superannuation on 31.05.2017. In the return of income furnished on 30.06.2018, the assessee claimed exemption for Leave Encashment of Rs.10,87,092/- u/s.10(10AA) of the Act. The return was processed by the CPC by limiting exemption to the extent of Rs.3.00 lakh and made addition of Rs.7,87,092/- disallowing the claim of exemption. The assessee filed an application u/s.154 of the Act on 14.11.2021 but failed to get any relief on the ground that the assessee being a Non-Government salaried employee is not allowed for total exemption of Leave Encashment u/s.10(10AA) of the Act. 4. Aggrieved assessee preferred appeal before the ld. NFAC but failed to succeed. Now the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. ITA No.2478/PUN/2024 Tanaji Kedari Sapkal 3 5. When the appeal was called for, none appeared on behalf of the assessee despite due service of notice of hearing, I therefore proceed to dispose of the appeal with the able assistance from the ld. Departmental Representative exparte qua the assessee. 6. I have heard the ld. Departmental Representative and perused the record placed before me. I have also gone through the contents of the Rectification application filed by the assessee before the lower authorities and also the proof of appointment of the assessee as Deputy General Manager with Department of Telecommunications, Maharashtra Circle vide order dated 31.10.1983. The assessee has given the bifurcation of the Leave Encashment of Rs.10,87,092/- which comprises of Rs.8,35,256/- received from Department of Telecommunications (Govt. of India) which is eligible for exemption u/s.10(10AA) of the Act and the remaining amount of Rs.2,51,836/- received from BSNL. While filing the application u/s.154 of the Act, the assessee has enclosed the letter dated 04.05.2012 regarding Leave Encashment amount, issued by Taxation section of BSNL, New Delhi. Copy also provided of the pay-slip regarding Leave Encashment period (DOT & BSNL) issued by BSNL which indicates the receipt of Leave Encashment for DOT & BSNL period separately. These facts remain uncontroverted at the end ITA No.2478/PUN/2024 Tanaji Kedari Sapkal 4 of the Revenue authorities at any stage. Section 10(10AA)(i) of the Act applies to the Central and State employees and section 10(10AA)(ii) to Non-Government employees. Leave Encashment for Central/State Govt. is fully exempt and therefore the amount of Rs.8,35,256/- received by the assessee from Department of Telecommunications (Govt. of India) deserves to be exempt from taxation u/s.10(10AA)(i) of the Act. As far as the remaining of Rs.2,51,836/- is concerned, the same being less than Rs.3.00 lakh is also exempt u/s.10(10AA)(ii) of the Act. Therefore, the impugned order denying exemption u/s.10(10AA) of the Act is reversed. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed. 7. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced on this 07th day of January, 2025. Sd/- (MANISH BORAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; \u0001दनांक / Dated : 07th January, 2025. Satish ITA No.2478/PUN/2024 Tanaji Kedari Sapkal 5 आदेश क\u0002 \u0003ितिलिप अ ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant. 2. \u000eयथ / The Respondent. 3. The Pr. CIT concerned. 4. िवभागीय ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “SMC” ब\u0014च, पुणे / DR, ITAT, “SMC” Bench, Pune. 5. गाड\u0004 फ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune. "