THRISSUR DISTRICT GOVERNMENT TEACHERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. V. THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER

WP(C)/38985/2022

AI Insights

The case involves the Thrissur District Government Teachers Co-operative Society Ltd., which is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society, challenging an assessment order under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2020-21. The assessment order rejected the petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P, citing insufficient evidence to prove that the petitioner satisfied the criteria of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society as required under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The petitioner argued that a recent Supreme Court judgment in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, which supports their position, should render the assessment incorrect. The appeal against the assessment order is pending before the National Faceless Appeal Centre.

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 750117 (HC-KERALA)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 05-12-2022
• Assessment Year: misc
• Other Referred Cases: Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. and others v. Commissioner of Income Tax and another [2021 (1) KLT 485]
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961, Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969
• Result in Favour of: Others
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Department Lawyers: JOSE JOSEPH
• Assessee Lawyers: HARISANKAR MENON; MEERA MENON; R SREEJITH; K KRISHNA
• Keywords: Appeal; Assessment Order; Condonation of delay; Deduction; Income Tax; Primary Agricultural Credit Society
• Section: 80P

Judgement Text

"IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 38985 OF 2022 PETITIONER: THRISSUR DISTRICT GOVERNMENT TEACHERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. R 294,NEAR BSNL OFFICE, NELLIKULANGARA ROAD, KODAKARA,THRISSUR – 680 684, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, JYOTHILAKSHMI P.K. BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON MEERA V.MENON R.SREEJITH K.KRISHNA RESPONDENTS: 1 THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI – 110 001. 2 NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, DELHI – 110 001, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS). 3 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 & TPS, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, ENGLISH CHURCH ROAD, PALAKKAD – 678 014. ADV. JOSE JOSEPH (SC) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 38985 OF 2022 2 JUDGMENT Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The petitioner sufferred Ext.P1 order of assessment under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2020-21. The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 applciation for condonation of delay of 27 days in filing the appeal. 2. In the assessment order, petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P was rejected on the ground that there was no evidence to show that petitioner satisfied the ingredients of the Primary Agricultural Credit Society as contemplated under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. 3. While assailing the assessment order before the 1st respondent, petitioner has sought to canvas that the judgment of the Supreme Court in Mavilayi Service Co- operative Bank Ltd. and others v. Commissioner of Income Tax and another [2021 (1) KLT 485] now governs the field thereby rendering the assessment itself as incorrect. 4. Since the petitioner has already preferred an appeal as Ext.P2 and the same is pending consideration before the 2nd WP(C) NO. 38985 OF 2022 3 respondent, I deem it fit that this writ petition be disposed of directing the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal in a time bound manner. 5. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2, as expeditiously as possible. 6. Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be initiated against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P1 assessment order. It is made clear that the appellate authority needs to consider the appeal on merits only if it decides to condone the delay of 27 days in filing the appeal. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK WP(C) NO. 38985 OF 2022 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 38985/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2020-21 DTD. 24-09-2022 Exhibit P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 19-11- 2022 Exhibit P3 COPY OF DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 19-11-2022 Exhibit P4 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 19-11-2022 "