TIRUPATI SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL,HIPPARGA KAJAL V. CIT EXEMPTION , PUNE

ITA 1681/PUN/2024

AI Insights

The case involves the Tirupati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, a trust, which appealed against the order of the CIT, Exemption, Pune, rejecting its application for registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The initial rejection was due to non-compliance with multiple notices requesting information to verify the genuineness of the trust's activities. The tribunal found that the notices were issued back to back without providing adequate time for compliance, and acknowledged that the non-compliance was partly due to the mistake of the trust's consultant. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the CIT's order and remanded the case for a fresh decision.

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 474186 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 04-12-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 02-12-2024
• Assessment Year: 2022-2023
• Appeal Filed On: 07-08-2024
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MANISH KUMAR SINGH
• Assessee Lawyers: NIKHIL MUTHA
• Keywords: Condonation of delay; Reasonable cause
• Section: 12AA

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.1681/PUN/2024 Tirupati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Hipparga Kajal, Ahmadpur, Latur- 413515. PAN : AABTT2673B Vs. CIT, Exemption, Pune. Appellant Respondent आदेश / ORDER PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 13.09.2023 passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune rejecting the application for registration u/s 12AA of the IT Act. 2. It is found that the appeal is filed belatedly. Ld. AR appearing for the assessee furnished application for condonation of delay along with affidavit. We are satisfied with the reasons mentioned in the application for condonation of delay & accordingly hold that the Assessee by : Shri Nikhil Mutha Revenue by : Shri Manish Kumar Singh Date of hearing : 02.12.2024 Date of pronouncement : 04.12.2024 ITA No.1681/PUN/2024 2 assessee was prevented by reasonable cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time limit. Ld. DR raised no serious objection to the prayer of the counsel of the assessee. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a trust filed application for registration in Form No.10AB under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the IT Act on 30.03.2023. With a view to verify the genuineness of the activities of the assessee and compliance to requirement of any other law for the time being in force by the trust/institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects, a notice was issued by LD CIT(E) through ITBA portal requesting the assessee to upload various information/clarification. The desired information was furnished by the assessee and another notice asking for further details was issued by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune, but no compliance was made from the side of the assessee. Another notice was issued to the assessee on the e-mail ID mentioned on the portal but again no compliance was made. Hence, Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune rejected the application for registration and also cancelled the provisional ITA No.1681/PUN/2024 3 registration granted to the assessee. It is this order against which the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. 4. Ld. AR appearing from the side of the assessee submitted before us that the ex-parte order passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune, is not justified. It was submitted by the counsel of the assessee that due to mistake of the earlier consultant M/s P.S. Kabra & Co. Chartered Accountants, the assessee could not submit desired information before Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune and accordingly it was requested before the Bench that the ex-parte order passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune may kindly be set-aside and in the interest of justice one opportunity may kindly be provided to the assessee to submit the desired information before Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune. 5. Ld. DR supported the orders passed by the subordinate authorities and requested to confirm the same. 6. We have heard Ld. Counsels from both the sides and perused the material available on record. We find that Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune has rejected the application for registration by an ex-parte order. We also find that admittedly Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune has ITA No.1681/PUN/2024 4 provided total three opportunities to the assessee. Against first notice part compliance was made but thereafter in a span of 10 days two notices were issued by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune which remained un-complied and accordingly Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune rejected the application for registration. We find that the notices were issued back to back and proper opportunity was not given to the assessee. Apart from above, we also find that e-mail ID mentioned on the portal is said to belong to the consultant (P. S. Kabra & Co.) and due to the mistake of the consultant, the compliance could not be made from the side of the assessee. Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice without going into the merits of the case, we set-aside the order passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune and remand the matter back to him with direction to decide the application for registration afresh as per fact and law after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also hereby directed to comply with the notices issued by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune and produce relevant documents/information in support of his application for registration, otherwise Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune ITA No.1681/PUN/2024 5 shall be at liberty to pass appropriate order as per fact and law. Thus, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are partly allowed. 7. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 04th day of December, 2024. Sd/- Sd/- (MANISH BORAD) (VINAY BHAMORE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER पुणे / Pune; ᳰदनांक / Dated : 04th December, 2024. Sujeet आदेश कᳱ ᮧितिलिप अᮕेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant. 2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent. 3. The CIT, Exemption, Pune. 4. The Pr. CIT/CIT concerned. 5. िवभागीय ᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “B” बᱶच, पुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. 6. गाडᭅ फ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune. "