" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT “SMC” BENCH, SURAT BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT AND MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 1115/SRT/2025 (Assessment Year: 2013-14) Utpalkumar Devendrakumar Thakor, 203, Samrajya Appt- 1, Royal Residency, Gogul Vihar Township Chharwada Road, Vapi-396191 PAN : AARPT3250A Vs. The DCIT, Vapi Circle, Vapi (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Suresh K. Kabra, C.A. Respondent by: Shri Ashish Kumar, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing 20.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement 23.01.2026 O R D E R PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- This is an appeal filed against the order dated 22-08-2024 passed by National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for assessment year 2013-14. 2. The assesee filed return of income at Rs. 39,58,637/- from salary and Rs. 18143/- from other sources. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee has given cash of Rs. 10,50,000/- for booking of his flat. The A.O. after taking cognizance of the reply of the assessee made addition of Rs. 5,25,000/- as on money payment u/s. 69 of the Act. The ld. A.R. submitted that the assessee has given the details along with ownership of the said flat along with his wife was purchased jointly of the consideration of Rs.60,00,000/-. The assessee has given details from the HDFC Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 1115/Srt/2025 Utpalkumar Devendrakumar Thakor Vs. ITO Asst. Year : 2013-14 - 2– Bank totaling to Rs. 9,92,500/- from the period 03-04-2012 to 28-03-2013. 3. The ld. D.R. relied upon the assessment order and the order of the CIT(A). 4. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. It is pertinent to note that that the assessee is a salaried and does not maintain regular books of accounts. In fact, the assessee has given details of withdrawals at page 7 of the paper book along with corresponding bank statement. The said fact was totally ignored by the A.O. as well as by the CIT(A). The contention of the assessee was that the cash payment as related to on money was also from accounted sources which stands verified from the bank account. Hence we hold that no addition is called for on account of on money. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. The order is pronounced in the open Court on 23.01.2026 Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (DR. B.R.R. KUMAR) (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) VICE-PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER Surat; Dated 23/01/2026 ak आदेश की \u0007ितिलिप अ ेिषत/ / / /Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ\u0011 / The Appellant 2. \u0007\u0012थ\u0011 / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु\u001a / Concerned CIT Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 1115/Srt/2025 Utpalkumar Devendrakumar Thakor Vs. ITO Asst. Year : 2013-14 - 3– 4. आयकर आयु\u001a ) ) ) ) अपील ( ( ( ( / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीय \u0007ितिनिध , , , , आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण , , , , /DR,ITAT, Surat, 6. गाड! फाईल / / / / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, TRUE COPY सहायक पंजीकार (Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ITAT, Surat Printed from counselvise.com "