VIJAY PARBHAKAR,BATALA V. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, BATALA

ITA 222/ASR/2024

AI Insights

The case involves an appeal by the late Vijay Prabhakar's estate against the order of the CIT (A), which sustained an addition of Rs.7,74,514 to the assessee's income under section 69A read with section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This addition was based on cash deposits made during the demonetisation period, which the Assessing Officer (AO) could not be satisfactorily explained by the assessee. The Tribunal examined the nature of these deposits, considering the business activities of the assessee, who was engaged in trading food products. The Tribunal's decision partially overturned the CIT (A)'s order by allowing the deposits made in new currency notes as part of the business turnover, thus reducing the taxable amount.

• Counselvise Citation: [2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 831772 (ITAT-AMRITSAR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 8 month(s) 30 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-01-2026
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Partly Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 22-04-2024
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Partly Allowed
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: CHARAN DASS
• Assessee Lawyers: AMIT HANDA; BHAVESH
• Section: 147; 148; 144; 2

Judgement Text

"IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR. BEFORE SH. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. UDAYAN DASGUPTA, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 222/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Late Vijay Prabhakar, (Through L/H) 239, Phase-1, C/o Prabhakar Food Products, South City, Batala. [PAN:-ADCPK5882D] (Appellant) Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Barnala. (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Amit Handa & Sh. Bhavesh Mahajan, CAs. Respondent by Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 19.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement 21.01.2026 ORDER Per: Udayan Dasgupta, J.M.: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT (A), NFAC, Delhi, passed u/s 250 of the Act, 1961 vide order dated 22.02.2024 which has emanated from the order of AO, NWR-W-(80)(91), passed u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act, vide order dated 29.03.2022. 2. There are 14 (fourteen) grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in Form 36 all relating to a single issue of (addition of Rs.7,74,514/- sustained by the ld. Printed from counselvise.com I.T.A. No. 222/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 2 CIT(A) u/s 69A of the Act r.w.s. 115BBE) on account of cash deposit in bank during the demonetisation period. 3. Brief facts emerging from records are that the assessee is engaged in the business of trading of food products and other related items under the trade name of M/s Praphakar Food Products and has filed his return alongwith audited accounts with a declared income of Rs.4,80,140/-. 3.1 The case was reopened u/s 147 of the Act vide notice u/s 148 dated 30.03.2021 after (necessary approval from higher authorities) in response to which the assessee has furnished his return of income and the matter was taken up for scrutiny and in course of assessment proceedings it was found that an amount of Rs.22.47 lakhs has been deposited in bank during the demonetisation period and in absence of any proper explanation from the assessee, the said amount was added back to the total income and the assessment has been completed accordingly on a total income of Rs.27.27 lakhs. 4. The matter was carried in appeal has been disposed of by the ld. CIT(A) by allowing part relief to the assessee on the basis of books of account including the cash book available on record. 5. The ld. first appellate authority has allowed the assessee the benefit of Rs.14.72 lakhs being the cash in hand available on date of demonetisation on Printed from counselvise.com I.T.A. No. 222/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 3 as per cash book, and consequently, the addition has been reduced by the said amount. 6. Now, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal praying for deletion of the balance remaining addition of Rs.7,74,515/-. 6.1 In course of hearing before the tribunal, the ld. AR of the assessee submitted a paper book containing the print out of the entire cash book for the F.Y. 2016-17 and has submitted that the entire deposit in bank account has been made out of the sale proceeds from the regular business of food products and the entire deposits are a part of the gross turnover which is duly disclosed in the books of account and in the audited balance sheet. 6.2 He further submitted that the cash balance as on 08.11.2016 was Rs.14.72 lakhs as per cash book, the benefit of which has been allowed by the ld. first appellate authority and the remaining amount of Rs.7,74,515/- has been sustained on the mis-conception that the said amount is deposit of SBN, when actually it is not so and an amount of Rs.5.50/- lakhs was deposited by way of new currency notes and the remaining amount are deposit of SBN. 6.3 He further submitted that even though these are the old SBN notes the same has come out of a joint family savings in old currency which has been exchanged with new currency in course of day to day business transactions. He Printed from counselvise.com I.T.A. No. 222/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 4 further submitted that the cash deposit was a part of the food business turnover and is duly disclosed in the regular books of account and the same is a part of the total turnover the source of the said deposits are fully explained and as such, section 69A shall not apply in this case. 7. The Ld. DR relied on the order of the Ld. CIT (A) and submitted that since the assessee is engaged in the business of food products there was no exemption given by the Government to the assessee for accepting of SBN after the date of 08.11.2016, and he further stated that since the benefit of cash in hand was already allowed by the ld. CIT(A) it is the remaining balance amount which has been added back, and he prayed for sustaining the order of the ld. CIT(A). 8. We have heard the rival submission and considered the materials on record and we find that cash deposits in bank account is day to day reflected in the cash book post demo period which arise out of sale proceeds of regular business activity supported by sales invoices, cash memos and VAT collection records which relates to regular business activity of the assessee. 8.1 We further note that as per the assessee’s own declaration (contained in page 238 of paper book) that cash deposit in bank account during the demonetisation period also contain new currency notes amounting to Rs.5.50 lakhs during the period 09.11.2016 to 30.12.2016, apart from the cash balance Printed from counselvise.com I.T.A. No. 222/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 5 of Rs.14.72 lakhs as on 08.11.2016 (already allowed by the ld. first appellate authority). As such, the benefit of this Rs.5.50 lakhs ( being the deposit of new currency) should be further allowed to the assessee to have arisen out of regular business activity which leaves the assessee with a balance amount of Rs.2,24,515/-, which shall be chargeable to tax at a normal rates considering the fact that the source of such cash deposits are explained to have come out the regular sale proceeds duly recorded in book of accounts and as such, the provisions of section 69A shall not apply. 9. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed. Order pronounced on 21.01.2026 in the Open Court Sd/- Sd/- (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (UDAYAN DASGUPTA) Accountant Member Judicial Member AKV Copy of the order forwarded to: (1)The Appellant (2) The Respondent (3) The CIT (4)The DR, I.T.A.T. True Copy By order Printed from counselvise.com "