PRAKASH KANT

Showing results 1-4 out of top 4 results

MADANGOPAL RAMKUMAR SIKAWAT,SURAT V. ITO, WARD 1(2)(1), SURAT., SURAT

ITA 918/SRT/2025

2013-2014

Pronouncement Date: -

Result: Partly Allowed

Surat

Set asideOpportunity of being heardNon compliance

147144271(1)(c)

MR MANISH JAGDISH BAJAJ,MUMBAI V. PCIT-41, MUMBAI

ITA 2758/MUM/2025

2020-2021

Pronouncement Date: -

Result: Assessee

Mumbai

Set asideOpportunity of being heardCorroborative evidencesAssessment recordRevision of order

143(3)142(1)263

ANILKUMAR JAGDISHRAJ SETH,MUMBAI V. ACIT, MUMBAI

CO 137/MUM/2024

2018-2019

Pronouncement Date: -

Result: Revenue

Mumbai

Set asideUnexplained expenditureUnexplained investmentSale consideration of property below Jantri ValueValuation report

50C

ACIT, MUMBAI V. ANILKUMAR JAGDISHRAJ SETH , MUMBAI

ITA 3378/MUM/2024

2018-2019

Pronouncement Date: -

Result: Assessee

Mumbai

Set asideUnexplained expenditureUnexplained investmentSale consideration of property below Jantri ValueValuation report

50C

Direct Tax

Direct Tax

Indirect Tax

Corporate Law

Other Links

Direct Tax

Direct Tax

Indirect Tax

Corporate Law

Other Links

PRAKASH KANT

Filters

MADANGOPAL RAMKUMAR SIKAWAT,SURAT V. ITO, WARD 1(2)(1), SURAT., SURAT

MR MANISH JAGDISH BAJAJ,MUMBAI V. PCIT-41, MUMBAI

ANILKUMAR JAGDISHRAJ SETH,MUMBAI V. ACIT, MUMBAI

ACIT, MUMBAI V. ANILKUMAR JAGDISHRAJ SETH , MUMBAI