"IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17643 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2025 Thana- PARSA District- Saran ====================================================== Viru Singh S/o Nagendra Singh R/o vill - Pure Chapra, P.S.- Parsa, Distt.- saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 19-03-2026 Heard Mr.Dewendra Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 06.01.2026 in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 310 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 30.09.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. Recovery is of 45 liters of illicit spirit liquor. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it appears from the FIR as well as the seizure list that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made from the Scooty in question and Sanoj Ram was apprehended alongwith Scooty as well as the liquor in question and the petitioner has Printed from counselvise.com Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17643 of 2026(2) dt.19-03-2026 2/3 been made accused in the present case merely on the ground that the petitioner is owner of the Scooty in question. As per FIR, allegation against the petitioner is that he was also alongwith the other co-accused person and petitioner was fled away from the place of occurrence and co-accused person, namely, Sanoj Ram, who was apprehended at the place of occurrence, has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 02.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 82111 of 2025 and the petitioner is in custody since 06.01.2026. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries three more cases other than the present one of similar nature but fairly submits that the petitioner is on bail in all the cases, as mentioned in para-3 of the bail petition. 6. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge- cum-Presiding Officer, Exclusive Special Excise Court No.-3, Saran at Chapra in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 310 of 2025, with the following conditions:- Printed from counselvise.com Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17643 of 2026(2) dt.19-03-2026 3/3 (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. Nitesh/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T Printed from counselvise.com "