" - 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13913 CA No. 268 of 2025 IN CA No. 46/2021 IN COP No.132/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 268 OF 2025 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO.46/2021 IN COMPANY PETITION No.132/2011 BETWEEN: OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S. ORDYN TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED ATTACHED TO THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ‘CORPORATE BHAVAN’ NO.26-27, 12TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS,M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …APPLICANT (BY SMT KRUTIKA RAGHAVAN FOR OL) AND: 1. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER O/O. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, CHENNAI TELEPHONES, 78 PURASAWAKKAM, HIGH ROAD, CHENNAI - 600 010 Printed from counselvise.com Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13913 CA No. 268 of 2025 IN CA No. 46/2021 IN COP No.132/2011 2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER BSNL, TAMILNADU CIRCLE OFFICE, NO.16, GREAMS ROAD, CHENNAI - 600 006. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.SHARANYA FOR SRI. GANGADHARAIAH A N.,ADVOCATE) THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED BY 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 151 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE READ WITH SECTION 9 OF COMPANIES ACT 1959 PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO PERMIT THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO FILE THEIR OBJECTION STATEMENT TO CLAIM STATEMENT FILED BY THE APPLICANT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPLICATION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE Printed from counselvise.com - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13913 CA No. 268 of 2025 IN CA No. 46/2021 IN COP No.132/2011 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the respondent in C.A.No.46/2021 submits that C.A.No.268/2025 is filed seeking leave of the Court to file statement of objection to C.A.No.46/2021. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant would oppose the application on the ground that sufficient cause is not shown for delay in filing the statement of objection. 3. It is noticed that the claim of Rs.1,42,694/- is made towards the alleged dues against the respondent company in liquidation. The Court has gone through the statement of objection. The respondent has disputed the liability. 4. Under these circumstances, the application in C.A.No.268/2025 is allowed by condoning the delay. The statement of objection is taken on record. The applicant has led the evidence. The respondent is permitted to Printed from counselvise.com - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13913 CA No. 268 of 2025 IN CA No. 46/2021 IN COP No.132/2011 cross-examine the applicant and also permitted to lead the evidence. 5. List before CPC on 10.03.2026 for recording evidence. 6. List this matter after conclusion of enquiry. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE RHS List No.: Sl No.: Printed from counselvise.com "