"1 ITA No. 580/Del/2025 Apsara Oswal v. ITO,Merrut A.Y. 2019-20 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘D’ AT NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 580/Del/2025 Assessment Year : 2019-20 Ms. Apsara Oswal 13A, Building No. 2 Aasah Apartments Deshpran Road, Aasah Kolkatta-700033 West Bengal v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Circle 2(2)(2) New Delhi \u0001थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No:AAGPO4897F Appellant .. Respondent Assessee represented by : Shri Rajat Gupta, Advocate Department represented by: Sh. M.S.Nethrapal, CIT DR Date of Hearing 28.07.2025 Date of Pronouncement .07.2025 O R D E R PER RAMIT KOCHAR, AM: This appeal in ITA No. 580/Del/2025, filed by the assessee for A.Y. 2019- 20 has arisen from the appellate order dated 29.11.2024 [DIN & Order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1070758753(1)] passed by the learned CIT(A), Delhi- Printed from counselvise.com 2 ITA No. 580/Del/2025 Apsara Oswal v. ITO,Merrut A.Y. 2019-20 43 u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”), which in turn had arisen from the assessment order dated 11.11.2021 passed by the LD. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle International Taxation 2(2)(2), New Delhi u/s 144 read with Section 144C(3) of the Act (DIN& ORDER No. :ITBA/AST/S/144/2021- 22/1036855767(1)). 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed her return of income declaring total income of Rs. 2,97,032/-. The case of the assessee was selected by Revenue for framing scrutiny assessment. Statutory Notices were issued by the AO. The assessee did not participated in the assessment proceedings. SCN was also issued by the assessee, but again there was no compliance. The AO passed an ex-parte assessment order in which he disallowed indexed cost of acquisition of property claimed by the assessee,as well cost of acquisition of the Mutual Funds were also denied by the AO. The income of the assesseewas assessed at Rs. 4,45,28,218/- as against the returned income of Rs. 2,97,032/-. The assessee filed first appeal with ld. CIT(A) ,but again there was no representation on behalf of the assessee and the appeal of the assessed was dismissed ex-parte by ld. CIT(A), wherein ld. CIT(A) did not adjudicated the issues arising in the appeal on merits but the same was dismissed in limine. Printed from counselvise.com 3 ITA No. 580/Del/2025 Apsara Oswal v. ITO,Merrut A.Y. 2019-20 3. The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee is NRI . The assessee was not aware of the departmental proceedings. Inadvertently, the assessee was allotted two PAN by department. The assessee applied for cancellation of one PAN. The department has denied indexed cost of acquisition of the property. It was gifted by father-in-law, and different PAN was issued at that time when the assessee acquired the same, and now while selling the said property second PAN was used. Thus, due to this inadvertent use of two different PAN , use of one PAN while acquiring the property and use of second PAN while selling the property , has led to denial of the cost of acquisition of the property. The cost of acquiring Mutual Fund was also not allowed by the AO . Thus, the entire sale proceed of immovable property as well sale proceeds of Mutual Fund were brought to tax by the AO. The ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee ex-partein liminewithout deciding the issues arising in the appeal. Prayers were made by ld. Counsel for the assesseeto set aside and restore the matter back to the file of the AO for denovo assessment on merits in accordance with law. Statement was made at Bar by the ld. Advocate who appeared on behalf of the assessee that if another opportunity is provided, the assessee will provide complete documents / information to enable assessing of the correct income in the hands of the assessee. Printed from counselvise.com 4 ITA No. 580/Del/2025 Apsara Oswal v. ITO,Merrut A.Y. 2019-20 4. The ld.CIT DR has no objection, if the matter is restored to the file of the AO for denovo assessment. 5. After hearing both the parties and perusing the material on record, we set aside the entire matter back to the file of the AO for denovo assessment on merits in accordance with law, after providing proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee and after considering all the evidences/documents as may be submitted by the assessee during denovo assessment. We clarify that we have not commented on the merits of the issues arising in the appeal, and all the contentions are kept open. We order accordingly. 6. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 30.07.2025 Sd/- Sd/- (SUDHEER PAREEK) (RAMIT KOCHAR JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated : 30.07.2025 Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT 6. Guard File ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT DELHI BENCHES Printed from counselvise.com "