BYK YOG ADHYATMIK FORUM,PUNE V. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

ITA 1401/PUN/2025

AI Insights

The case involves BYK Yog Adhyatmik Forum, which appealed against the order of the CIT (Exemption), Pune, rejecting their application for grant of registration under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and cancelling the provisional registration granted earlier under section 12AB. The CIT (Exemption) had rejected the application due to non-compliance with notices requesting information to verify the genuineness of the trust's activities. The tribunal, considering the circumstances and the assessee's request for another opportunity to present their case, decided to remand the matter back to the CIT (Exemption) for a fresh decision.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 785273 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 month(s) 29 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-10-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 29-05-2025
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: AMOL KHAIRNAR
• Assessee Lawyers: SHUBHAM N RATHI VIRTUAL
• Keywords: Opportunity of being heard
• Section: 12A

Judgement Text

"IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT AND MS. ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1401/PUN/2025 BYK Yog Adhyatmik Forum Plot No.22, CTS No.15847 / 102, Aditya Nagar, Garkheda Parisar, Aurangabad – 431001 Vs. CIT (Exemption), Pune PAN: AALCB0251G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Shubham N Rathi (virtual) Department by : Shri Amol Khairnar CIT-DR Date of hearing : 28-10-2025 Date of pronouncement : 28-10-2025 O R D E R PER ASTHA CHANDRA, JM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 28.04.2025 of the Ld. CIT(Exemption), Pune rejecting the application for grant of registration u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) and cancelling the provisional registration granted earlier u/s 12AB of the Act. 2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee filed an application in Form No.10AB on 27.01.2025 for registration of the trust under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act. With a view to verify the genuineness of the activities of the assessee and compliance to requirements of any other law for the time being in Printed from counselvise.com 2 ITA No.1401/PUN/2025 force by the trust / institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects, a notice was issued through ITBA portal on 10.03.2025 requesting the assessee to upload certain information / clarification. The assessee was also requested to submit the compliance by 25.03.2025. Since the assessee did not comply to the said notice, another opportunity was granted by the Ld. CIT(E) vide notice dated 03.04.2025 asking the assessee to explain as to why the application for registration u/s 12A should not be rejected and why the provisional registration granted earlier u/s 12AB should not be cancelled. Further, the assessee was specifically informed that in the event of failure to comply by the due date, the application shall be liable to be rejected and the registration shall also be liable to be cancelled. 3. However, the assessee did not make any submission. The Ld. CIT(E) therefore, rejected the application for grant of registration u/s 12A of the Act and also cancelled the provisional registration granted earlier u/s 12AB by observing as under: “4. The assessee was requested to submit compliance by 25/03/2025. The notice was duly served on the assessee through e-portal and email. Since the assessee did not furnish compliance to the said notice, another opportunity was given to the assessee vide notice dated 03/04/2025 requesting it to show cause as to why the application should not be rejected and why the registration granted under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 should not be cancelled. The assessee was specifically informed that in the event of failure to comply to the said notice, its application shall be liable to be rejected and the registration/approval shall also be liable to be cancelled. The assessee was also given opportunity of being heard vide the said notice. However, the assessee neither submitted the above mentioned compliance nor availed the opportunity of being heard. The assessee was requested to submit compliance by 11/04/2025. The assessee was also given opportunity of being heard vide the said notice. The notice was duly served on the Printed from counselvise.com 3 ITA No.1401/PUN/2025 assessee through e-portal and email. However, the assessee neither furnished its compliance to the show cause notice nor availed the opportunity of being heard. 5. The information / details were called for under the provisions of section 12AB(1)(b)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. These are the basic details required to ascertain the overall nature of the activities of the assessee and are directly relevant to the present proceedings. However, the assessee has failed to comply despite giving sufficient opportunities as discussed above including an opportunity of being heard. 6. Thus, the assessee has failed to furnish the details called for under the provisions of section 12AB(1)(b)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to verify the genuineness of activities of the trust / institution and to verify the compliance to requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the trust / institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects. 7. In absence of the compliance to the above requirement, it is not possible to arrive at any conclusion about the genuineness of activities of the assessee and the compliance to the requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the trust / institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects. 8. It is clear from the above that the assessee was given sufficient opportunity to comply, but it has not complied to the same. It seems that the assessee is not having any supporting documents / evidence to submit. The assessee has failed to comply with the provisions of section 12AB(1)(b)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Hence, the undersigned is unable to draw any satisfactory conclusion about genuineness of activities of the assessee and the compliance to the requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the trust / institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects. Therefore, the undersigned has left no alternative but to reject the application. 9. In view of the above, the application filed by the assessee is hereby rejected and the provisional registration granted on 22/12/2023 under section 12AB read with section 12A(1)(ac) (vi) (A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is hereby cancelled.” 4. Aggrieved with such order of Ld. CIT(E), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset submitted that due to non- intimation of the notice by the accountant of the trust to the trustees, who are not well versed with the Income tax proceedings, the details could not be filed. He Printed from counselvise.com 4 ITA No.1401/PUN/2025 submitted that given an opportunity the assessee is in a position to substantiate its case by filing all the relevant details for deciding the issue afresh. He accordingly submitted that in the interest of justice the matter may be restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for adjudication of the issue afresh. 6. The Ld. DR on the other hand strongly objected to the arguments advanced by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee. 7. We have heard the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the order of the Ld. CIT(E) and the paper book filed on behalf of the assessee. It is an admitted fact that due to non-compliance to the notices issued by the Ld. CIT(E), he rejected the application for grant of registration and also cancelled the provisional registration granted earlier. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that given an opportunity the assessee is in a position to substantiate its case by filing all the relevant details before the Ld. CIT(E). Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the CIT(E) with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case by filing the requisite details to his satisfaction and decide the issue as per fact and law. The assessee is also hereby directed to submit the details as called for by the CIT(E) on the appointed date without seeking any adjournment under any pretext, failing which the CIT(E) Printed from counselvise.com 5 ITA No.1401/PUN/2025 is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. We hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes. 8. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court at the conclusion of hearing itself i.e. on 28th October, 2025. Sd/- Sd/- (R. K. PANDA) (ASTHA CHANDRA) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER पुणे Pune; दिन ांक Dated : 28th October, 2025 GCVSR आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant; 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 3. 4. The concerned Pr.CIT, Pune DR, ITAT, ‘A’ Bench, Pune 5. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune Printed from counselvise.com 6 ITA No.1401/PUN/2025 S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 28.10.2025 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 28.10.2025 Sr. PS/PS 3 Draft proposed & placed before the Second Member JM/AM 4 Draft discussed/approved by Second Member AM/AM 5 Approved Draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr. PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of Order Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr. PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order Printed from counselvise.com "