CHAMARGAJANAGARA DIST MILK PRODUCERS AND CO-OP SOCIETIES EMPLOYEES WELFARE TRUST ,MYSURU V. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS, WARD, MYSORE

ITA 2047/BANG/2024

AI Insights

The case involves M/s. Chamarajanagara Dist Milk Producers and Coop Societies Employees Welfare Trust, which appealed against the ex-parte order passed by the learned CIT (A) for the Assessment Year 2021-22. The primary contention was the addition of Rs.3,01,99,587 and a demand of Rs.1,45,38,700 raised by the CPC, which was confirmed by the CIT(A) due to non-submission of the audit report in Form 10B within the due date. The assessee argued that they were not given a proper opportunity of hearing and were not well-versed with the online income tax proceedings. The Tribunal, considering the circumstances and in the interest of justice, decided to remit the issue back to the JAO for a fresh assessment.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 43515 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 14-02-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2021-2022
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: PRANAV
• Keywords: Condonation of delay
• Section: 11; 12; 10B

Judgement Text

"IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI. SOUNDARARAJAN K, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2047/Bang/2024 Assessment Year : 2021-22 M/s. Chamarajanagara Dist Milk Producers and Coop Societies Employees Welfare Trust, Kuder village and Post SanthemarahalliHobli, Chamrajnagar, Chamrajnagar– 571 316. PAN :AAACTC 8419 R Vs. ITO (Exemptions), Ward, Mysore. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Pranav, Advocate Revenue by : Smt. Neha Sahay, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore. Date of hearing : 05.02.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 14.02.2025 ORDER Per Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member : This appeal filed by the assessee is challenging the ex-parte Order passed by learned CIT (A), vide DIN and Order No.ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1068021775(1) dated 27.08.2024, for the Assessment Year 2021-22. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the assessee filed return of income on 15.03.2022 within the extended time for filing return of income on 28.12.2022 by making addition of Rs.3,01,99,587/- and raised ITA No.2047/Bang/2024 Page 2 of 3 demand of Rs.1,45,38,700/-. Against the demand raised by the CPC, assessee filed appeal before the learned CIT(A) and the learned CIT(A) issued various notices on different dates but thee was no compliance from the assessee and assessee has filed on acknowledgement of application before CIT(E) for condonation of delay in filing Form 10B and no other documents were submitted and it was also noted by the CIT(A) that the assessee has not submitted audit report in Form 10B within the due date as per the provisions of the Act. Therefore, as per provision to section12A(1)(b) of the Act, the benefit of sections 11 and 12 of the Act were not allowed and confirmed the addition made by the CPC and appeal was rejected on 27.08.2024. The assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal against the Order of CIT(A) on 28.08.2024 by delay of 2 days. However, the assessee had paid appeal fee on 18.10.2024 vide BSR Code 6360014 and Sl. No.0274 for Rs.10,000/-. Therefore, the delay for filing appeal by 2 days is hereby condoned. The learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the learned CIT(A) has not given proper opportunity of hearing and passed ex-parte Order within a very short period of time. The addition has also wrongly been made by the CPC and the assessee is not well conversant with the online income tax proceedings and he undertook that if a chance is given to the assessee, assessee shall comply with all the notices of the Revenue. 3. The learned DR submitted that various opportunities were granted to the assessee but he did not respond properly and objected for giving further chance. 4. Considering the rival submissions, the CPC had disallowed the claim of the assessee and raised a demand as noted supra and during the ITA No.2047/Bang/2024 Page 3 of 3 appellate proceedings there was no proper response from the assessee side. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we are remitting the issue back to the file of JAO for fresh consideration. JAO is directed to provide reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee and assessee is directed to submit necessary documents to the Revenue in support of its claim for speedy disposal of the case and avoid to unnecessary adjournments. In case of failure on second leniency shall be granted 5. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Pronounced in the court on the date mentioned on the caption page. Sd/- Sd/- (SOUNDARARAJAN K) (LAXMI PRASAD SAHU) Judicial Member Accountant Member Bangalore, Dated : 14.02.2025. /NS/* Copy to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. Pr.CIT4.CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, Bangalore. By order Assistant Registrar ITAT, Bangalore. "