IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LUCKNOW BENCH 'B', LUCKNOW. BEFORE SHRI H. L. KARWA, HON'BLE VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI N. K. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER C.O. NO.24/LUC/10 (IN I.T.A. NO.418/LUC/10) ASSESSMENT YEARS: 01-02 SMT. PUNITI ROHRA, VS. DY. C. I. T.-II, 120/500 (20), KANPUR. LAJPAT NAGAR, KANPUR. (OBJECTOR) (RESPONDENT) C.O. NO.25/LUC/10 (IN I.T.A. NO.419/LUC/10) ASSESSMENT YEARS: 01-02 SMT. RICHA ROHRA, VS. DY. C. I. T.-II, 120/500 (20), KANPUR. LAJPAT NAGAR, KANPUR. (OBJECTOR) (RESPONDENT) OBJECTOR BY : SHRI ABHINAV MEHROTRA, C. A. RESPONDENT BY: SHRI ANADI VERMA, D. R. O R D E R PER N. K. SAINI: THESE CROSS OBJECTIONS FILED BY THE ASSESSEES ARE ARISING OUT OF ITA NOS. 418 AND 419/LUC/10 RESPECTIVELY WHICH ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE SEPARATE ORDERS EACH DATED 25/03/2010 OF THE CIT(A) -II, KANPUR. IN THESE -: 2 :- CROSS OBJECTIONS, THE ASSESSEES HAVE MERELY SUPPORT ED THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIT (A). 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT HE HAS THE INSTRUCTION NOT TO PRESS THESE CROSS OBJECTIONS AND GAVE IN WRITING AS UNDER: THE C.O. IN SUPPORT OF CIT (A) MAY BE TREATED AS W ITHDRAWN. 3. THE LEARNED D. R. DID NOT OBJECT IF THE CROSS OB JECTIONS ARE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE CROSS OBJECTIONS OF T HE ASSESSEES ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE CROSS OBJECTIONS OF THE ASSES SEES ARE DISMISSED. (THE ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 23 /11/2010) SD/. SD/. (H. L. KARWA) ( N. K. SAINI) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 23/11/2010 *SINGH COPY FORWARDED TO THE: - 1. APPELLANT. 2. RESPONDENT. 3. CIT (A) 4. CIT 5. DR. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR