SHRI VIMAL SINGHVI, Jaipur V. ACIT, Jaipur

CO 50/JPR/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3126 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 8 year(s) 11 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Cross Objection
• Pronouncement Date: 28-05-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 28-06-2012
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: BK GUPTA
• Assessee Lawyers: RAJEEV SOGANI CA A

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S,B JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SING H YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA. NO. 535/JP/2012 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2008-09 THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. SHRI VIMAL SHINGVI PROP. M/S ADITI DIAMONDS, 80, SURAJ NAGAR, (WEST), CIVIL LINES, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AFGPS 8499 J VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ CO. NO. 50/JP/2012 (ARISING OUT OF ITA NO. 535/JP/2012) FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2008-09 SHRI VIMAL SHINGVI PROP. M/S ADITI DIAMONDS, 80, SURAJ NAGAR, (WEST), CIVIL LINES, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AFGPS 8499 J VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI B.K. GUPTA (CIT) FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI RAJEEV SOGANI (C.A.) A LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 28/05/2021 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT :28/05/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER ITA NO. 535 & CO NO.50/JP/2012 ACIT VS. SHRI VIMAL SINGHVI 2 PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AND THE CRO SS OBJECTION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-I, JAIPUR DATED 07.03.2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09. 2. THE LD A/R HAS STATED AT THE BAR THAT THE ASSES SEE HAS FILED A PETITION UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME-2020 TO SE TTLE THE AFORESAID MATTER AND THE SAID PETITION HAS RECENTLY BEEN ACCE PTED AND FORM 3 HAS BEEN ISSUED ON 15.04.2021 BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORIT Y. IT WAS ACCORDINGLY REQUESTED THAT THE APPEAL OF THE DEPART MENT AND CROSS OBJECTION OF THE ASSESSEE BE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN. 3. THE LD. DR IS HEARD WHO DID NOT RAISE ANY SPECI FIC OBJECTION IN ACCEPTING THE SAID PRAYER BY THE ASSESSEE. 4. IN VIEW OF ABOVE, THE PRAYER OF THE ASSESSEE IS ACCEPTED AND THE REVENUES APPEAL AND CROSS OBJECTION BY THE ASSESSE E ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 28/05/2021. SD/- SD/- LANHI XKSLKBZ FOE FLAG ;KNO ( SANDEEP GOSAIN ) (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 28/05/2021. *SANTOSH VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- ACIT, CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR. ITA NO. 535 & CO NO.50/JP/2012 ACIT VS. SHRI VIMAL SINGHVI 3 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- SHRI VIMAL SHINGVI , JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE { ITA NO.535/JP/2012 & CO NO. 50/JP/2012} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR