COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V. INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

TAXC/5/2010

AI Insights

The case involves the Commissioner of Income Tax, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, as the appellant, against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, and M/s. Sewas Singh Oberai & Company, the respondents. The legal proceedings pertain to an appeal concerning income tax assessments and related defaults. The court's decision primarily focused on procedural compliance regarding the filing and handling of tax appeals. The appellant was granted a specific timeframe to rectify the default in filing, emphasizing the court's procedural requirements in tax litigation.

• Counselvise Citation: [2009] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 768744 (HC-CHHATTISGARH)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 02-04-2009
• Assessment Year: misc
• Result in Favour of: Others
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Department Lawyers: T
• Assessee Lawyers: S RAO
• Keywords: Income Tax; Tax appeal; Default Filing

Judgement Text

"u 3 g .: “ 3 ” x B E F O R E T H E H O N ’ B L E H I G H C O U R T O F C H H A T T I S G A R H A T B I L A S P U R 9 T A X C A S E N o . 8 7 / 0 A 2 9 6 7 ” A P P E L A N T C o m m i s s i o n e r o f I n c o m e T a x , f ” , \" V ' R a i p u r , C h h a t t i s g a r h . V E R S U S g R E $ B O N D E N T S t / l h 1 I n c o m e T a x A p p e l l a t e T r i b u n a l , N a g p u r B e n c h , N a g p u r . , 2 ) M / s . S e w a s S i n g h O b e r a i 8 5 C o m p a n y , D a l l i r a j h a r a , D i s t t . D u r g ( C . G . ) _ . i , 1 D I V I S I O N B E N C H : i H O N ‘ B L E M R . D H I R E N D R A M I S H R A & H n N ' R I F M D R 1 7 . T h n n w n r . T J ' ‘ 0 2 . 4 . 2 0 0 9 M r ‘ . S . R a j e s h w a r ‘ R a o , i S ‘ r a n d i n g C o u n s e l f o r f h e ‘ ‘ a g p e H a n ’ r . T h e m a f ' r e r ' i s l i s t e d o n d e f a u l ‘ r . L e a r n e a c o u n s e l f o r T h e a p p e l l a n l ' p r a y s f o r a n d i s g r a n f e d f o u r w e e k s ' ‘ r i m e T o r e m o v e T h e d e f a u l t f a i l i n g w h i c h T h e p e f i ’ r i o n s h a l l a u f o m a ‘ r i c a l l y s ’ r a n d d i s m i s s e d w i f h o u ‘ r f u r t h e r r e f e r e n c e ‘ r o T h e B e n c h . / / < ; 9 _ 5 d r 3 & M p } i ~ « m ~ m m ~ w i J h a n w a ‘ ; o n J u d g e J u d g e o n l y , "