DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), MUMBAI V. SAACHI SALES AGENCY PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 275/MUM/2025

AI Insights

The case involves the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (DCIT), Central Circle-3(2), Mumbai, as the appellant, and Saachi Sales Agency Private Limited as the respondent. The dispute arose from an assessment order under sections 143(3) read with section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, following a search operation. The A.O. had made protective additions regarding share application money and unaccounted expenditure, which were later deleted by the CIT(A). The revenue challenged these deletions, leading to the current appeal. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the application of substantive and protective additions between different entities within the same group, necessitating a de novo assessment.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 825116 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 11 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 31-12-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 15-01-2025
• Laws Referred To: Income-tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: ARUN KANTI DATTA
• Keywords: Set aside; Unexplained expenditure; Income from undisclosed sources; Accommodation entries; Bogus Share capital; Bogus
• Section: 143(3); 153A

Judgement Text

"IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘G’ BENCH: MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 275/Mum/2025 Assessment Year: 2012-13 DCIT, Central Circle-3(2) Room No. 402, Kautilya Bhawan, BKC, Mumbai-400051 Vs. Saachi Sales Agency Private Limited Shop No 4, Tapovan View CHS Ltd. Pathanwadi Road, Malad (East) Mumbai- 400097 PAN: AAPCS4281B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : None Respondent by : Shri Arun Kanti Datta, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 16.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 31.12.2025 O R D E R PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the revenue for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 18.11.2024 in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [hereinafter “AO”] u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) dated 29.12.2016. Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 275/Mum/2025 Saachi Sales Agency Private Limited :- 2 -: 2. When the appeal was called for , none appeared from the respondent assessee’s side. Notices were earlier issued on 7 occasions and also through Ld. DR , but none from assessee’s side appeared. Therefore the appeal is decided with the able assistance of Ld. CIT(DR ) . 3. The assessee has filed his return of income showing total income of Rs. 3,10,380/-. Subsequently, pursuant to a search conducted in the case of the assessee in First Winner Group of cases on 11.08.2014 , notice u/s 153A dated 06.05.2015 was issued and the assesse filed return on 23.02.2016 at total income of Rs.3,10,380/-. The A.O in the assessment order has noted that during the course of search proceedings, it was found that several group companies were paper companies having dummy directors .The statement of dummy directors such as Smt Namrata Jadhav, Shri Sachin Jadhav, Shri Manubhai Patel, Shri Kamlesh Patel, etc were recorded who admitted that they were dummy directors in the companies owned and controlled by Shri Rinku Patodia. They admitted that they knew nothing about the nature of business of the said companies nor attended any Board meeting. They were only signing documents as per directions given by Shri Rinku Patodia and Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 275/Mum/2025 Saachi Sales Agency Private Limited :- 3 -: M/s Saachi Sales Agency Pvt Ltd is a paper company as per the statement of Shri Rinku Patodia. Further, The statements made by dummy directors were confronted to Shri RinkuPatodia, the Managing Director of the First Winner Industries Limited and group companies who in his statement recorded u/s.132(4) on 11/08/2014 and on 12/08/2014 admitted and confirmed that M/s First Winner Group has received accommodation entries in the form of share application money through Shri Praveen K. Jain and the same were shown as investments of share capital in his group companies, controlled and managed by him. Further, Shri Rinku Patodia also admitted that the directors were either his employees, relatives or persons who were merely name sake / dummy directors in the paper companies. 4. The assessee during the relevent previous year has shown investment of Rs. 9,06,00,00/- in the form of share capital in M/s First Winner Textiles (India) Pvt. Ltd. The A.O has discussed the modus operandi of these paper concerns at para 11 of the assessment order and concluded that the assessee was a paper entity of Shri Rinku Patodia established only for the purpose of routing the bogus share application money and the amount shown in share application money is nothing but money belonging to Shri Rinku Patodia routed through Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 275/Mum/2025 Saachi Sales Agency Private Limited :- 4 -: this paper entity. The A.O therefore has made the addition of share application money invested in First winner Textiles (India) Pvt. Ltd of Rs 4,60,00,000 /- on protective basis as addition has been made in the hand of beneficiary company First winner Textiles (India) Pvt. Ltd on substantive basis . On appeal Ld CIT(A) has deleted the addition on protective basis as the same has been confirmed in the beneficiary M/s First Winner Industries Ltd on substantive basis. The observation of Ld CIT(A) is as under : “6.3. Decision: The findings of the AO and the submission of the appellant in the appeal memo have been considered. It is seen that in the instant case the AO has made addition of Rs.4,60,00,000/- on a protective basis since the appellant has been held to be a conduit in the entire operation wherein M/s First Winner Industries Ltd was the ultimate beneficiary of these accommodation entries. The substantive addition of Rs.4,60,00,000/- on account of share application money has been done by the AO in the hands of M/s First Winner Industries Ltd for the AY 2012-13. It is further seen that the CIT(A) has already adjudicated upon the issue of addition of unexplained share application money in the hands of M/s First Winner Industries Ltd on a substantive basis. In para 6.3.24 of order in Appeal No: CIT(A)-51/IT-346/DCITCC-3(2)/16-17 dated 27.03.2019, the CIT(A) has confirmed the addition of Rs.23,00,00,000/- which includes the amount of Rs.4,60,00,000/- from the appellant in the hands of M/s First Winner Industries Limited. Since the addition on a substantive basis already stands confirmed, the consequential addition on protective basis cannot be sustained. Thus, the addition of Rs.4,60,00,000/- in the hands of the appellant on a protective basis is deleted. Further since the addition is deleted, the Page 6 of 7 AAPCS4281B- SAACHI SALES AGENCY PRIVATE LIMITED A.Y. 2012-13 ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1070428222(1) Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 275/Mum/2025 Saachi Sales Agency Private Limited :- 5 -: question of making any payment for taking the accommodation entry also does not arise. The addition of Commission @ 2.5% amounting to Rs.11,50,000/- is also deleted. The grounds of appeal of the appellant are therefore allowed.” 5. The AO has also made addition of unaccounted expenditure for the accommodation entry observing that the assessee must have incurred some commission expense on the said accommodation entries which has not been accounted for in the assessee's books of accounts. Such expenditure incurred has been meted out from unaccounted income generated from the business of the assessee. Thus as per prevailing market rate of commission charged on such accommodation entries, estimating commission @ 2.5% on routing of bogus share application money, an amount of Rs.11,50,000/- [2.5% of (Rs.4,60,00,000/-)] is also added to the income of the assessee on protective basis. The Ld. CIT(A) deleted the above addition also . 6. At the outset, the Learned Departmental Representative ( D.R) submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has deleted the addition on the basis of finding that substantive addition of share application money of Rs. 4,60,00,000/- in the beneficiary M/s First Winner Industries has already been confirmed. The Ld. DR pointed out that the A.O has made Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 275/Mum/2025 Saachi Sales Agency Private Limited :- 6 -: addition of share application money in the case of M/s First Winner Textiles (India) Pvt. Ltd., but Ld. CIT(A) has discussed the share application in M/s First Winner Industries, which is a different company with different PAN. The Ld.DR has also brought in our notice that share application money as discussed in para 5.3 of assessment order is Rs. 9,06,00,00/- but, the A.O has made addition of only Rs.4,60,00,000/-. The Ld DR therefore submitted that matter be restored back to A.O for denova assessment . 7. We have heard the Ld DR and gone through the material available. We find that the A.O in the assessment order has mentioned share application money of Rs. 9,06,00,00/- in M/s First Winner Textiles (India) Pvt. Ltd. but has made the protective addition of Rs. 4,60,00,000/-. The Ld. CIT(A) has deleted the addition on the basis of share application money Of Rs 4,60,00,000/- confirmed on substantive basis in the case of M/s First Winner Industries Limited, which is different company than alleged by A.O to be beneficiary of share application. We, therefore set aside the order of lower authorities and restore the matter to the file of A.O to pass the de novo assessment order after affording proper opportunity to the assessee. Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 275/Mum/2025 Saachi Sales Agency Private Limited :- 7 -: 8. In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is statistically allowed. Order pronounced on 31st day of December, 2025 at Mumbai. Sd/- Sd/- (BEENA PILLAI) Judicial Member (JAGADISH) Accountant Member Mumbai, Dated: 31st December, 2025. Poonam Mirashi (Stenographer) Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The CIT (Appeals) 5. The DR, I.T.A.T. By order (Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai Printed from counselvise.com "