DIPINDER SANDHU,MUMBAI V. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 23(1), MUMBAI

ITA 5191/MUM/2024

AI Insights

This case involves an appeal by Dipinder Sandhu against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) / National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), which confirmed the disallowance made by the AO under section 14A read with rule 8D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The disallowance pertained to interest and indirect expenses amounting to Rs. 23,58,557, which were added back to the assessee's income for the Assessment Year 2016-17. The AO had noted an increase in the assessee's investments and corresponding exempt dividend income, leading to the application of section 14A and rule 8D. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, leading to the current appeal. The tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not provided sufficient time for the assessee to present necessary details, thus violating principles of natural justice, and restored the matter to the AO for a fresh decision.

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 473784 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-12-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2024
• Assessment Year: 2016-2017
• Appeal Filed On: 04-10-2024
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, Income Tax Rules
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: R.R. MAKWANA
• Assessee Lawyers: RAHUL HAKANI
• Keywords: Principle of natural justice; Earning of tax free income; Rule 8D
• Section: 14A

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE PRESIDENT & MS PADMAVATHY S, AM I.T.A. No. 5191/Mum/2024 (Assessment Year: 2016-17) Dipinder Sandhu, 41, Sunset Apartment, Sherly Rajan Road, Bandra (W), Mumbai-400050. PAN : AANPS1106L Vs. ACIT, Circle-23(1), Piramal Chamber, Lalbaugh, Parel, Mumbai-400012. Appellant) : Respondent) Appellant /Assessee by : Shri Rahul Hakani, AR Revenue / Respondent by : Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 28.11.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 05.12.2024 O R D E R Per Padmavathy S, AM: This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) / National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [in short 'the CIT(A)'] dated 06.08.2024 for AY 2016-17. The assessee raised the following grounds of appeal: “1. The Learned NFAC erred in confirming addition u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D of Rs 23,58,557/- being addition of interest u/r 8D(2)(ii) of Rs 18.38,657/- and indirect expenses u/r 8D(2)(iii) Rs 5,19,901/- without appreciating that the addition of Rs 23.58.557/- is bad in law. 2 ITA No.5191/Mum/2024 Dipinder Sandhu 2. The Learned NFAC erred in confirming addition of interest of Rs. 18,38,657/- u/s 14A r.w. rule 8D(2)(ii) without appreciating that interest bearing funds are not utilized for making investments which has earned tax free income and also the interest free funds available with Assessee are more than interest bearing funds and hence the addition of Rs. 18,38,657/- may be deleted. 3. The Learned NFAC erred in confirming addition of indirect expenses of Rs. 5,19,901/- u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(iii) without appreciating that Assessee has not incurred any expenses to earn exempt income and assessee was himself handling the investments and exempt income is directly credited to bank account and hence the addition of Rs. 5.19.901/- may be deleted. 4. Without prejudice to above, in the facts and circumstances of the case, addition u/s 14A may be restricted to a reasonable amount.” 2. The assessee is an individual engaged in the business of co-ordination and production of advertising in the name of proprietorship concern M/s Cutting Edge Pictures. The assessee filed the return of income for AY 2016-17 on 17.10.2016 declaring a total income of Rs. 1,98,50,070/-. The return was selected for scrutiny and the statutory notices were duly served on the assessee. The AO noticed that the assessee has shown an investment of Rs. 11,27,79,640/- for the year ended 31.03.2016 as against the investment of Rs. 9,51,80,620/- in the earlier years. The AO further notice that the assessee has shown dividend income of Rs. 10,03,648/- and has claimed exemption under section 10(34) of the Act. Since the assessee has not disallowed any amount incurred towards earning exempt income, the AO invoked the provisions of section 14A r.w.r 8D and made a disallowance of Rs. 23,58,557/- under Rule 8D(2)(ii) and (iii) of the Income Tax Rules. Aggrieved the assessee filed further appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order by confirming the disallowance made by the AO since the assessee did not file any details or respond to the notices. 3 ITA No.5191/Mum/2024 Dipinder Sandhu 3. We heard the parties and perused the material on record. It is submitted that the CIT(A) did not give sufficient time to the assessee to collate the required details and therefore, the order of the CIT(A) is against the principles of natural justice. We notice that before the CIT(A) the assessee did not respond to the notices and nor did file any further details. Further from the perusal of AO's order we notice that the AO while making the disallowance under section 14A r.w.r. 8D has not recorded any findings on merits and has simply made the addition for the reason that the assessee has not made any disallowance towards earning exempt income. Considering the facts and circumstances peculiar to the case in the interest of natural justice and fair play, we are inclined to give one more opportunity to the assessee to contend the issues on merits before the lower authorities. Accordingly, the issues are restored back to the AO for fresh consideration on merits with a direction to call for necessary details and decide in accordance with law. The assessee is directed to submit the details as may be called and cooperate with the assessment proceedings. It is ordered accordingly. 4. In result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 05-11-2024. Sd/- Sd/- (SAKTIJIT DEY) (PADMAVATHY S) Vice President Accountant Member *SK, Sr. PS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 4. 5. Guard File CIT BY ORDER, (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai "