DORMAKABA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KANCHEEPURAM V. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), , CHENNAI

ITA 2974/CHNY/2024

AI Insights

M/s. Dormakaba India Pvt. Ltd. appealed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-16, Chennai, which denied the refund of excess Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) claimed by the company. The company argued that the DDT on dividends paid to its German parent company should be taxed at 10% as per Article 10 of the India-Germany DTAA, rather than the higher rate specified under Section 115-O of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal, referencing a decision by the Special Bench in the case of DCIT v. Total Oil India (P) Ltd., concluded that the tax rate applicable to DDT is governed by Section 115-O of the Act, irrespective of the DTAA provisions.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 126640 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 23-04-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2016-2017
• Other Referred Cases: DCIT v. Total Oil India (P) Ltd.
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961, India-Germany DTAA
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: I.ROOPA
• Assessee Lawyers: SANDEEP PINCHA
• Keywords: TDS; Double taxation relief
• Section: 90

Judgement Text

"आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘ए’ \u0001यायपीठ, चे ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI \u0001ी एबी टी. वक , ाियक सद\u0011 एवं एवं एवं एवं \u0001ी अिमताभ शु\u0018ा, लेखा सद क े सम\u001b BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.2974 to 2977/Chny/2024 िनधा\u000eरण वष\u000e/Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2018-19 & 2020-21 M/s.Dormakaba India Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.48/3, Mahindra World City, 8th Avenue, Anjur Village, Paranur, Chengalpattu Taluk, Kancheepuram District-603 002. v. The DCIT, Corporate Circle-1(1), Chennai. [PAN: AAACD 3980 D] (अपीलाथ\u0016/Appellant) (\u0017\u0018यथ\u0016/Respondent) अपीलाथ\u0016 क\u001a ओर से/ Appellant by : Mr.Sandeep Pincha, CA \u0017\u0018यथ\u0016 क\u001a ओर से /Respondent by : Dr.I. Roopa, Addl.CIT सुनवाईक\u001aतारीख/Date of Hearing : 27.02.2025 घोषणाक\u001aतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 23.04.2025 आदेश / O R D E R PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: These are appeals preferred by the assessee company against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-16, (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), Chennai, dated 25.09.2024 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as \"AY”) 2016-17 to 2018-19 & 2020-21. 2. At the outset, both the parties agreed that the issues permeating in all the Captioned Appeals are similar/identical and therefore, the decision ITA Nos.2974 - 2977/Chny/2024 (AY 2016-17 to 2018-19 & 2020-21) M/s.Dormakaba India Pvt. Ltd. :: 2 :: made in the lead case for AY 2016-17 would decide the fate of other appeals. Therefore, we proceed to adjudicate the appeal for AY 2016-17. 3. Ground No.1 is general in nature which doesn’t require any adjudication, therefore, we proceed to other grounds raised by the assessee. 4. And note that the only issue raised before us is whether the provisions of the Tax Treaty [DTAA] Article 10 of the India-Germany DTAA would override the provisions of Sec.115-O of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act‘). 5. Brief facts are that the assessee company filed its RoI for AY 2016- 17 on 22.12.2016 admitting total income at Rs.40,70,15,590/- which was later selected for scrutiny. The AO framed the assessment by making certain additions by order dated 28.12.2018 by assessing the income of the assessee at Rs.41,56,33,990/-. 6. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld.CIT(A) wherein the assessee has raised additional grounds of appeal wherein the assessee prayed for refund of excess Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) deposited by it. In this regard, the Ld.CIT(A) has noted that the assessee is an Indian company engaged in the business of manufacturing and wholesale trading of automatic door operators, door controls and ITA Nos.2974 - 2977/Chny/2024 (AY 2016-17 to 2018-19 & 2020-21) M/s.Dormakaba India Pvt. Ltd. :: 3 :: accessories and, inter alia, has claimed refund of excess DDT of Rs.66,96,786/- to its shareholder M/s.Dorma Germany on the plea that the rate of TDS should be governed by Article 10 of the India-Germany DTAA and not by Section 115-O of the Act. The Ld.CIT(A) further noted that the assessee has declared dividend of Rs.6,46,55,782/- out of which Rs.6,46,55,781/- pertained to dividend paid to its holding company viz., M/s.Dorma Vertrieb International GmbH (hereinafter referred to as ‘M/s Dorma Germany’) and that, the assessee had remitted DDT amounting to Rs.1,31,62,365/- u/s.115-O of the Act. According to the assessee, M/s.Dorma Germany is a tax resident of Germany and it holds valid Tax- Residence Certificate (TRC) issued by the tax authorities of Germany. According to the assessee, as per section 90 of the Act, M/s.Dorma- Germany is eligible to avail the benefit under India-Germany DTAA. And, as per Article 10 of the India-Germany DTAA, dividend is taxable @10%; accordingly, the rate of tax for dividend under the India-Germany DTAA is beneficial tax rate dividend u/s.115-O of the Act. Therefore, it was prayed before the Ld.CIT(A) that the dividend distributed to M/s.Dorma- Germany should be liable for DDT @ of only 10% as prescribed under the India-Germany DTAA. Thus, the assessee prayed for claiming of refund of excess DDT remitted viz., Rs.66,96,786/- [Rs.1,31,62,364/- minus Rs.64,65,578/-]. However, the Ld.CIT(A) was of the view that dividend declared/distributed by the domestic company to the non-resident ITA Nos.2974 - 2977/Chny/2024 (AY 2016-17 to 2018-19 & 2020-21) M/s.Dormakaba India Pvt. Ltd. :: 4 :: shareholder(s) would attract Additional Income Tax [Tax on Distributed Profits] referred to in sec.115-O of the Act, i.e., at the rate mentioned in sec.115-O of the Act and not at the rate of taxes applicable to the non- resident shareholders as specified in the relevant DTAA, by relyinf on the decision of the Special Bench of this Tribunal [Mumbai] in the case of DCIT v. Total Oil India (P) Ltd., reported in [2023] 149 taxmann.com 332 [Mumbai-Trib.] in ITA No.6997/Mum/2019 for AY 2016-17 dated 20.04.2023, and dismissed the ibid additional ground raised by the assessee. 7. Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. 8. Having heard both the parties and after perusal of the records, we find that the facts discussed supra are not in dispute. So, it is not repeated for the sake of brevity. And while adjudicating the issue on hand, the Ld.CIT(A) is noted to have rightly followed the ratio/decision of the Special Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Total Oil India (P) Ltd. (supra), and since, the Ld.AR couldn’t point out any change in facts or law, and hence, we don’t find any infirmity in Ld.CIT(A) following the ratio laid by Special Bench on the issue, wherein, Special Bench concluded as under:- Conclusion: 83. For the reasons give above, we hold that where dividend is declared, distributed or paid by a domestic company to a non-resident shareholder(s), ITA Nos.2974 - 2977/Chny/2024 (AY 2016-17 to 2018-19 & 2020-21) M/s.Dormakaba India Pvt. Ltd. :: 5 :: which attracts Additional Income Tax (Tax on Distributed Profits) referred to in sec.115-O of the Act, such additional income tax payable by the domestic company shall be at the rate mentioned in section 115-O of the Act and not at the rate of tax applicable to the non-resident shareholder(s) as specified in the relevant DTAA with reference to such dividend income. Nevertheless, we are conscious of the sovereign's prerogative to extend the treaty protection to domestic companies paying dividend distribution tax through the mechanism of DTAAs. Thus, wherever the Contracting States to a tax treaty intend to extend the treaty protection to the domestic company paying dividend distribution tax, only then, the domestic company can 6 claim benefit of the DTAA, if any. Thus, the question before the Special Bench is answered, accordingly. Since Ld. CIT(A) has followed a binding judicial precedent, we find no reason to interfere in the impugned orders, for all the years. 9. In the light of the decision of the Special Bench decision in the case of Total Oil India (P) Ltd. (supra), we hold that where dividend is declared, distributed or paid by a domestic company to a non-resident shareholder(s), it attracts Additional Income Tax (Tax on Distributed Profits) referred to in sec.115-O of the Act, and such additional income tax payable by the domestic company shall be at the rate mentioned in section 115-O of the Act and not at the rate of tax applicable to the non- resident shareholder(s) as specified in the relevant DTAA with reference to such dividend income and confirm the action of the Ld.CIT(A), and resultantly, dismiss the appeals of the assessee. 10. In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed. Order pronounced on the 23rd day of April, 2025, in Chennai. Sd/- (अिमताभ शु\u0018ा) (AMITABH SHUKLA) लेखा सद\u0003य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Sd/- (एबी टी. वक ) (ABY T. VARKEY) \u0005याियक सद\u0003य/JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.2974 - 2977/Chny/2024 (AY 2016-17 to 2018-19 & 2020-21) M/s.Dormakaba India Pvt. Ltd. :: 6 :: चे ई/Chennai, !दनांक/Dated: 23rd April, 2025. TLN आदेश क\u001a \u0017ितिलिप अ$ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ /Appellant 2. \u000e\u000fथ /Respondent 3. आयकरआयु\u0015/CIT, Chennai / Madurai / Salem / Coimbatore. 4. िवभागीय\u000eितिनिध/DR 5. गाड फाईल/GF "