" - 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:26178 WP No. 17450 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 17450 OF 2024 (T-IT) BETWEEN: HARMAN CONNECTED SERVICES CORPORATION INDIA PVT. LTD., (FOR THE MERGED ENTITY SYMPHONY SERVICES PUNE PRIVATE LIMITED) A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.3 AND 3A, EOIZ INDUSTRIAL AREA, SURVEY NOS. 85 AND 86, SADARAMANGALA VILLAGE, KRISHNARAJAPURAM HOBLI, WHITEFIELD S.O., RAMAGONDANHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 066, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. VIVEK KHEMKA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T. SURYANARAYANA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(1) (1), BMTC BUILDING, 6TH BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095. Digitally signed by YAMUNA K L Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:26178 WP No. 17450 of 2024 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(1)(1), BMTC BUILDING, 6TH BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095. 3. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3, BMTC BUILDING, 6TH BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. DILIP, JR. STANDING COUNSEL) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 29/03/2024 BEARING NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A/2023- 24/1063636083(1) (ANNEXURE-G) PASSED BY THE R2 UNDER SECTION 148A(d) OF THE ACT, REJECTING THE PETITIONERS OBJECTIONS AS TO THE INITIATION OF THE ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The petitioner - Harman Connected Services Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., has called in question the correctness of the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') at Annexure-'G' as well as the notice under Section 148 of the Act at Annexure-'H' and the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act at Annexure-'E'. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:26178 WP No. 17450 of 2024 2. Learned Senior Counsel Sri. T. Suryanarayana appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was an entity that was formed after the scheme of amalgamation which was approved by the orders of the High Court of Bombay, whereby the merger of Symphony Services Pune Private Limited into M/s. Harman Connected Services Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., was ordered with effect from 01.04.2008. 3. It is further submitted that this aspect of merger of Symphony Services Pune Pvt. Ltd., with the petitioner was brought to the notice of the authority in terms of the representation on 25.02.2011. Copy of the said intimation is produced at Annexure-'A'. It is submitted that despite such communication being addressed to the Income Tax Officer in the year 2011, notice is issued at Annexure-'E' under Section 148A(b) of the Act to M/s. Symphony Services Pune Pvt. Ltd. on 14.03.2024. It is submitted that the notice to a non-existing entity would be null and void and without jurisdiction and reliance is - 4 - NC: 2024:KHC:26178 WP No. 17450 of 2024 placed on the order of the Apex Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., reported in (2019) 107 Taxmann.com 375 (SC). 4. Perused the notice at Annexure-'E', same is issued to M/s. Symphony Services Pune Pvt. Ltd. The factum of merger of Symphony Services Pune Pvt. Ltd., with the petitioner has been brought to the notice of the Income Tax Officer in terms of the representation at Annexure-'A'. It is specifically averred in the said representation that M/s. Symphony Services Pune Pvt. Ltd., had merged with the petitioner with effect from 01.04.2008 by virtue of scheme of amalgamation being sanctioned by the High Court of Mumbai. If that were to be so, the question of initiating proceedings of reassessment by notice to Symphony Services Pune Pvt. Ltd., on 14.03.2024 would not arise. - 5 - NC: 2024:KHC:26178 WP No. 17450 of 2024 5. The Apex Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., had clarified that the notice to a non- existing entity would be one without jurisdiction. Clearly once the authorities record the change of entity by a merger, the notice to Symphony Services Pune Pvt. Ltd., on 14.03.2024 could not have been issued. 6. On the ground that notice being issued to a non-existing entity is one without jurisdiction, notice at Annexure-'E' is set aside. The consequential proceedings including the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act at Annexure-'G' is set aside so also the notice under Section 148 of the Act at Annexure-'H' is set aside. Once Annexure-'E' is set aside, all such proceedings that are consequent to the notice at Annexure-'E' are liable to be set aside. 7. It is also noticed that the proceedings at Annexures-'G', 'H' and 'E' are also as regards the return of - 6 - NC: 2024:KHC:26178 WP No. 17450 of 2024 income of Symphony Services Pune Pvt. Ltd., which is a non-existing entity as on the date of issuance of notice, which are not legally sustainable. 8. Accordingly, petition is disposed off. Sd/- JUDGE MCR "