HARMIT BAWA,DELHI V. CENTRAL CIRCLE-27, DY, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI, DELHI

ITA 3345/DEL/2025

AI Insights

The case involves appeals by Harmit Bawa against the orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-29, New Delhi, which arose from the orders passed by the DCIT, CC-27, New Delhi under sections 153C read with section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals pertained to the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16. The primary contention was that the assessments were made beyond the statutory period allowed for reopening assessments based on the satisfaction recorded following a search and seizure operation at the premises of Rupali Buildwell group. The tribunal examined the timeline of events, including the recording of satisfaction and the issuance of notices, and concluded that the assessments for the years in question were indeed beyond the permissible period, leading to the quashing of the assessments.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 781943 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 29-10-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Appeal Filed On: 21-05-2025
• Other Referred Cases: CIT-14 vs Jasjit Singh [TS-5199-SC-2023-O], Pr. CIT, Central-1 vs Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd. [TS-5183-HC-2024(Delhi)-O]
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MAHESH KUMAR
• Assessee Lawyers: RAJENDRA SINGH RATHORE; MANPREET SINGH KAPOOR
• Keywords: Search and seizure
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES: G : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITAs No.3326 & 3345/Del/2025 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Harmit Bawa, C-38, 1st Floor, Pamposh Enclave, New Delhi – 110 048. PAN: ASQPB0280K Vs DCIT, CC-27, Delhi (Appellants) (Respondents) Assessee by : Shri Rajendra Singh Rathore, Adv. & Shri Manpreet Singh Kapoor, CA Revenue by : Shri Mahesh Kumar, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 29.09.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 29.10.2025 ORDER PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM: These are appeals preferred by the assessee against the orders dated 20.03.2025 of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-29, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’) in appeals No.CIT(A), Delhi-29/10584/2013-14 and CIT(A), Delhi- 29/10766/2014-15, respectively, arising out of the appeals before it against the orders dated 16.05.2023 passed u/s 153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, Printed from counselvise.com ITAs No.3326 &3345/Del/2025 2 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) by the DCIT, CC-27, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO). 2. On hearing both the sides, in regard to the present assessment year, the case of the assessee is that the assessment is beyond the period of six years from the date of recording of the satisfaction. The facts in the case are arising out of the return filed on 06.02.2015 and the subsequent search and seizure operation which was carried out on 22.08.2019 at the premises of Rupali Buildwell group. In the case of the assessee, certain documents were found of incriminating nature in the said search for which proceedings u/s 153C of the Act were initiated. Though the case of the assessee is that there were no incriminating material, but, otherwise what is relevant is that notice u/s 153C of the Act was issued on 06.08.2022 in response to which the assessee filed return of income on 05.09.2022. The copy of the satisfaction note shows the same was recorded on 15.03.2022 by the AO of the searched person and, on that date, documents were forwarded to the AO. That being the case, the search year happens to be AY 2022-23 and the six assessment years falling for consideration for reopening search assessment fall upto the year 2017-18. Thus, the present assessment year 2014-15 and 2015-16 are beyond the period of reopening of such assessment permitted under the law. For this proposition, we rely the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case CIT-14 vs Jasjit Singh [TS-5199-SC- Printed from counselvise.com ITAs No.3326 &3345/Del/2025 3 2023-O] and of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Pr. CIT, Central-1 vs Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd. [TS-5183-HC-2024(Delhi)-O]. 3. Thus Ground no. 4 in both the appeals is sustained. The appeals are allowed. Impugned assessments stand quashed. Order pronounced in the open court on 29.10.2025. Sd/- Sd/- (NAVEEN CHANDRA) (ANUBHAV SHARMA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 29th October, 2025. dk Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi Printed from counselvise.com "